Medicare has officially launched a new compliance program that will dramatically impact Pain Management practices beginning January 2026:

WISeR — Wasteful and Inappropriate Service Reduction Model
(A CMS/CMMI Innovation Model Powered by AI + Enhanced Medical Review)

WISeR is designed to reduce inappropriate procedures and tighten access to payment for selected high-cost pain interventions. Unlike previous pilots, WISeR extends strict prior authorization oversight directly into the clinic setting — even POS 11 (Office).
​
This is a fundamental shift in how Pain Management will get paid.

📌 Which Pain Practices Are Impacted?

If your practice:
✅ Treats Original Medicare patients (not MA)
✅ Performs interventional pain procedures
✅ Is located in any of the following WISeR jurisdictions:
✅ Arizona
✅ New Jersey
✅ Ohio
✅ Oklahoma
✅ Texas
✅ Washington

🏥 Included Sites of ServiceWISeR applies across multiple care settings:

• Office (POS 11)
• Home (POS 12)
• Hospital Outpatient (POS 19 & 22)
• Ambulatory Surgery Center (POS 24)

✅ Yes — in-office interventional pain procedures are included.
This is a key operational shift.

⏱ When the Model Begins

• Prior authorization submissions begin: January 5, 2026
• Payment enforcement date: January 15, 2026
• Planned performance period: Through December 31, 2031

🩺 Pain Management Procedures Included in WISeR
This reflects only the Pain Management–relevant procedures included in WISeR.


1️⃣ Epidural Steroid Injections (ESIs)
CPT Codes (from Appendix A):
62321, 62323, 64479, 64480, 64483, 64484
Documentation indicators:

• Radiculopathy or neurogenic claudication
• Pain ≥ 4 weeks + failed conservative therapy
• Functional scoring required at baseline and follow-up
• Maximum 4 ESI sessions per spinal region per 12 months
• At least 50% sustained improvement for additional sessions

Documentation Requirements (Source: Wiser Model Section 6.2.11 - (https://www.cms.gov/files/document/wiser-provider-supplier-guide.pdf)

6.2.11. Epidural Steroid Injections for Pain Management (L39015, L39240, L36920):
General documentation requirements for epidural steroid injection (ESI) are as follows:
❑ Documentation of history, physical examination, and radiological testing demonstrating one of the following: a) Lumbar, cervical, or thoracic radiculopathy; radicular pain and/or neurogenic claudication due to disc herniation; osteophyte or osteophyte complexes; severe degenerative disc disease, producing foraminal or central spinal stenosis;
OR b) Post-laminectomy syndrome (persistent or recurrent spinal pain after a prior spine surgery); OR c) Acute herpes zoster associated pain
❑ Documentation that radiculopathy, radicular pain and/or neurogenic claudication is severe enough to greatly impact quality of life or function, including documentation that an objective pain scale or functional assessment was performed at baseline (prior to interventions) and the same scale was repeated at each follow-up for assessment of response
❑ Documentation of pain duration of at least four weeks, and the inability to tolerate noninvasive conservative care OR medical documentation of failure to respond to four weeks of noninvasive conservative care OR acute herpes zoster refractory to conservative management where a four-week wait is not required 19
❑ Documentation of anticipated number of ESI sessions (four or less) per spinal region in a rolling 12-month period. For repeat sessions, documentation of at least 50% sustained improvement in pain and/or function from baseline on the same scale for at least 3 months a) Of note, if the first ESI underperforms, a repeat session after 14 days may be done with a different approach/level/medication and a clear rationale
❑ If applicable: In exceptional and unique cases, documentation establishing the patient-specific need for moderate or deep sedation, general anesthesia, or monitored anesthesia care, as these are generally not required for the procedure
❑ Documentation of the type of image guidance (fluoroscopy or CT with contrast) to be used. If the patient has a documented contrast allergy or pregnancy, ultrasound guidance without contrast may be considered ❑ Documentation of the planned approach, including targeted level(s) and region(s).
Of note, transforaminal ESIs (TFESIs) up to 2 levels in one spinal region; interlaminar ESI or caudal ESIs up to 1 level in one spinal region; and bilateral TFESI only when clinically indicated (e.g., documented bilateral foraminal stenosis or central herniation affecting both roots) are considered medically reasonable and necessary.
❑ Documentation that the ESI is performed in conjunction with conservative treatments, including but not limited to a combination of: a) Medication b) Physical Therapy c) Spinal manipulation therapy d) Cognitive behavioral therapy e) Home exercise program
❑ Documentation that the patient is part of an active rehabilitation program, home exercise program, or functional restoration program ​


2️⃣ Spinal Cord Stimulator — Permanent Implantation
✅ Spinal Cord Stimulator (SCS) Trial Requirement Under WISeR:
A successful trial is required before Medicare will consider covering a permanent SCS implant.
CMS states:
“Prior authorization is being implemented for the permanent implantation procedure.
A trial procedure should be done, and documentation should be submitted as part of the prior authorization request for permanent implantation of a stimulator device.”
Additionally, the medical documentation must show both:

• 50% reduction in pain, and
• Evidence of functional restoration
  with a temporarily implanted electrode

General documentation requirements for laminectomy for the implantation of a spinal cord stimulator for the relief of chronic intractable pain are as follows:
❑ Documentation of condition requiring procedure and applicable physical exam
❑ Documentation that stimulation is being used only as a late resort (if not a last resort) for patients with chronic intractable pain, including but not limited to at least one treatment tried and failed (or documentation that they were contraindicated):
a) Medications
b) Physical therapy
c) Injections
​d) Spine surgery
e) Cognitive behavioral therapy
❑ Documentation showing that the patient was evaluated by a multidisciplinary team (including psychological, surgical, medical and physical therapy)
❑ Documentation showing that the patient achieved demonstrated 50% reduction in pain relief and evidence of functional restoration with a temporarily implanted electrode
❑ Documentation that the patient is not a candidate for percutaneously placed leads (e.g., previous instrumentation, challenging anatomy, high BMI, other technical challenges)


🔎 What this means operationally:
For a permanent SCS implant to be approved under WISeR:

1. A trial must be performed in advance
2. The clinical documentation must demonstrate that the trial worked
3. All trial-related documentation must be included in the prior authorization submission

Without that evidence → Medicare will not approve the permanent stage.

3️⃣ Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation(Vertebroplasty / Kyphoplasty)
CPT Codes:
22511, 22512, 22513, 22514, 22515
Documentation indicators:

• Acute or subacute vertebral compression fracture (≤12 weeks)
• Imaging confirmed
• Functional impairment documented (e.g., RDQ scoring)
• Osteoporosis evaluation + prevention/treatment plan

4️⃣ Cervical Fusion
Documentation indicators:

• Structural instability, tumor involvement, or infection
• Deformity with severe functional limitation
• Pseudarthrosis or surgical failure documentation
• Radiographic evidence supporting criteria

Note: Certain cervical fusion codes (22551/22552) not included under WISeR where already subject to Hospital OPD prior auth rules

Site of Service:

• POS 11 — Office 
• POS 12 — Home 
• POS 19 & 22 — Hospital Outpatient 
• POS 24 — Ambulatory Surgery Center 

This is a key operational change — in-office procedures are now medically reviewed.
Other specialties may be impacted as well, but these are most relevant to Pain Medicine.

📌 Core Determination StandardCoverage requires proof that the service is:

✅ Reasonable and Necessary(according to the applicable LCD/NCD)
Documentation must consistently reflect:

• Diagnosis supported by clinical findings
• Functional impairment
• Conservative therapy history
• Appropriate imaging
• Clear medical necessity rationale
• Place of service alignment

Each procedure type has its own minimum clinical documentation elements that must be included.

🔎 What Happens Without Prior Authorization?
If a covered procedure is performed without obtaining prior authorization:

1. The claim is suspended
2. The provider receives a documentation request
3. Documentation must be submitted within 45 days
4. A decision is issued within 3 days once documents are received

A payment decision is not guaranteed — all Medicare appeals rights remain available.

🧭 Why This Matters for Pain Practices:
Pain procedures under WISeR:

• Are elective
• Have specific LCD criteria
• Are often high medical review risk
• Carry significant variation in documentation quality

WISeR is designed to identify clinically inappropriate use and enforce national & local coverage rules more consistently.

📘 Educational Takeaways for Providers:
​Pain practices should:

• Review LCD/NCD requirements for each impacted service
• Ensure medical necessity is supported in every encounter note
• Track number of sessions per spinal region for ESIs
• Document conservative therapy failure thoroughly
• Capture functional improvement metrics at each follow-up
• Align scheduling to safeguard compliance before delivery
• Prepare for pre-payment review workflows when PA is not obtained

✅ CMS Regulatory-Style Citation (commonly used in compliance documentation)Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Wasteful and Inappropriate Service Reduction (WISeR) Model — Provider and Supplier Operational Guide. Published October 10, 2025. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/files/document/wiser-provider-and-supplier-guide.pdf

1) Scope & Intent (What these codes are)

What:
Standardized test administration and scoring to evaluate cognitive and behavioral effects of central nervous system (CNS) impairment — diagnostic, not therapy.
​
Why:
Testing must inform diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment planning in a medically necessary pain management strategy.

Current (valid) CPT® codes only:

• 96136 – QHP* administration & scoring, first 30 min (≥31 min)
• 96137 – QHP add-on, each additional 30 min
• 96138 – Technician administration & scoring, first 30 min → requires direct supervision
• 96139 – Technician add-on, each additional 30 min → requires direct supervision

* QHP = Psychologist / Physician / NP / PA acting within Medicare scope
These services must produce actionable findings that change the pain plan.​

2) Medical Necessity (WHEN you may test)

Covered only when results directly change pain management decisions such as:

• Neuromodulation (SCS/PNS/pump) candidacy & safety
  
• Opioid-related cognitive impairment affecting risk/compliance
  
• CRPS / chronic pain with psychological overlay
  
• Post-TBI or neurological disease affecting rehab performance
  
• Cognitive impact of CNS-acting medications requiring plan modification

CMS standard: If testing does not change care → NOT covered

Not medically necessary (do not bill):

• Screening tools alone: MMSE / MoCA / PHQ-9
  
• Educational/vocational evaluations
  
• Routine Alzheimer’s follow-up with no plan change
  
• Patient cannot validly participate (incl. intoxication)
  
• Repeat testing without new clinical justification
  ​

3) Time & Billing Rules (HOW to code)
31-minute rule: Minimum 31 minutes required per unit of service
Multi-day testing: Total all minutes → bill on final DOS
Add-on codes:

• 96137 requires 96136
• 96139 requires 96138
  → Only after full additional 30 min is met
  
  

Technician codes require:

• Direct supervision
• QHP on-site & immediately available

Only administration & scoring included
→ Interpretation/report writing = separate code family
Standard test batteries are NOT automatically covered
→ Each test must be individually justified

4) Documentation Requirements (WHAT the chart must show)
Your documentation MUST include:

• Clear clinical findings supporting suspected CNS impairment
• Medical necessity: why testing is needed now
• Named standardized tests administered (not generic references)
• Exact time per CPT and per date
• Patient behavior & test validity observations
• Functional implications (adherence, decision-making, safety)
• Specific treatment changes based on results
• Prior testing reviewed — duplication avoided
• Report sent to ordering/referring provider

If >8 hours → add written justification

Audit Pro-Tip:
Include management change:
“Findings support proceed with SCS trial”
“Adjust opioid plan due to cognitive risk”
“Defer high-risk procedures pending cognitive improvement”

5) Compliance Guardrails (avoid denials)

• Must be diagnostic — NOT psychotherapy
• Do NOT bill screening inventories alone
• Must document direct supervision for 96138/96139
• Remove deleted legacy codes:
  96101–96120, 96111
• Results must be tied to medical decision-making
• Only licensed, Medicare-enrolled QHPs can bill

If medical necessity or supervision is unclear → denial likely

6) EMR Smart-Phrases:
Medical Necessity (MDM)
Neuropsychological test administration and scoring were medically necessary to evaluate cognitive and behavioral factors materially impacting neuromodulation suitability and/or opioid medication safety. Results will directly inform treatment selection, adherence strategies, and clinical risk mitigation in the pain plan.
Time & Tests Block
Standardized tests administered and scored: [LIST TESTS]. Total face-to-face administration/scoring time: [MINUTES]. Time from multiple days combined and billed on the final date of service. Final report provided to referring provider.

✅ ADDITIONAL SECTIONS (as promised)

7) Utilization Safeguards

• Repeat testing only with new clinical indication
• Extended testing (>8 hrs) requires rationale
• Medical records must reflect integration of prior tests

​
8) Ordering & Supervision

9) Denial Prevention Checklist

✅Before billing → Confirm ALL:
✔ 31+ minutes documented per code
✔ Named standardized tests
✔ Treatment plan change explicitly stated
✔ Direct supervision (if Tech)
✔ Report sent to ordering provider

✅ CMS References and Sources:

1️⃣ Local Coverage Determination
LCD L34646 – Psychological and Neuropsychological Testing
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
🔗 https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/view/lcd.aspx?lcdid=34646
2️⃣ Billing & Coding Article
Billing and Coding: Psychological and Neuropsychological Testing (A57481)
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
🔗 https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/view/article.aspx?articleid=57481

​

Telehealth transformed how medical practices operate. During the pandemic, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) granted broad flexibilities that let clinicians care for patients at home, bill for audio-only phone visits, and use almost any digital platform to keep care moving. These changes created unprecedented access and new revenue opportunities for primary care, specialty clinics, and multi-site practices.

That era of open-ended telehealth reimbursement is about to change. Starting October 1, 2025, Medicare will implement new site-of-service and billing rules that directly affect how physicians, advanced practitioners, and practice administrators schedule visits, document care, and secure payment. Commercial payers are already signaling that they will follow Medicare’s lead.

For physician groups and medical practices of every size this is more than a technical adjustment. These changes can reshape revenue streams, staffing patterns, patient experience, and long-term business strategy.
This article provides a comprehensive guide to the coming shift. You will learn:
✅ What exactly changes on October 1, 2025, and why CMS is drawing a clear line between the temporary pandemic policies and permanent telehealth regulations
✅ How the new CPT code 98016 replaces the older audio-only telephone visit codes and what that means for compliance and revenue
✅ The operational and financial implications for medical practices across all specialties
✅ Concrete steps practice leaders must take—from updating scheduling workflows to educating providers and patients—to remain compliant and profitable.

By understanding the rationale behind the new rules and preparing strategically, medical practices can continue to offer convenient virtual care while protecting revenue and avoiding audit risk.
Pandemic Telehealth Expansion: A Quick BackgroundBefore the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency, Medicare telehealth was tightly limited. Patients generally had to be in a rural area and physically present at an approved originating site such as a hospital or clinic, to receive covered telehealth services. Audio-only visits were not reimburse,d and most physicians used telehealth only occasionally.

The Public Health Emergency changed everything. To maintain access to care, CMS temporarily allowed patients to receive telehealth visits from home, permitted billing for audio-only services using CPT codes 99441 to 99443 for brief telephone visits, and expanded the list of eligible providers and services.
These flexibilities fueled an explosion in telehealth use. Practices invested in telehealth platforms, trained staff, and wove virtual care into daily operations. Many organizations built entire business lines such as remote chronic care management, same-day urgent visits, and hybrid scheduling around these temporary rules.

Why October 1, 2025 Matters
​When Congress extended pandemic-era telehealth flexibilities, it set September 30, 2025 as the final date for many of those provisions. CMS has confirmed that beginning October 1, 2025, Medicare will revert to a more traditional telehealth framework:
• Patients must be at an approved originating site such as a rural clinic, hospital, or federally qualified health center for most telehealth services to be reimbursed
• Home-based telehealth visits for most specialties will no longer be covered unless the patient meets very specific exceptions
• Audio-only visits are no longer broadly payable. The telephone E/M codes 99441 to 99443 were deleted

January 1, 2025. CMS has introduced a new brief-communication code, CPT 98016, but it is not a direct substitute for the deleted telephone codes
For medical practices, this is a fundamental shift. The convenience of checking in with patients at home through a quick phone call will no longer generate revenue under Medicare rules. Without proactive planning, practices risk denied claims, lost revenue, and compliance exposure.

CPT 98016: The New Brief Communication CodeCPT 98016 is now Medicare’s only payable option for a brief technology-based interaction that is shorter and less formal than a full telehealth visit.
Purpose and format
✅ Short clinical discussion to assess a problem, give advice, or decide whether an in-person visit is needed
✅ Telephone, video, or other HIPAA-compliant two-way communication
✅ Five to ten minutes of professional time
✅ Must be patient-initiated or performed with documented patient consent when staff offers the service
Critical billing conditions
​
• The communication cannot occur within seven days of a related E/M service or procedure for the same problem
• It cannot lead to an in-person or telehealth E/M visit within 24 hours or the soonest available appointment for the same problem
• Documentation must include patient consent, time spent, and the clinical decision made
Because of these guardrails, a routine follow-up call a few hours after a medial branch block to document pain relief does not qualify for 98016. That contact is considered part of the procedure’s global service and is not separately billable.

Financial reality
Reimbursement for 98016 is modest—generally in the $15 to $20 range depending on locality. It can still be valuable for brief, patient-initiated interactions that meet all criteria, but it cannot replace the revenue once generated by 99441 to 99443.

Originating Sites and Licensing Requirements:
The patient’s originating site is the physical location where the patient sits during the telehealth visit. Beginning October 1 2025, Medicare will pay for most telehealth services only if the patient is physically present at an approved site such as:
✅ Physician or practitioner office
✅ Hospital outpatient department or critical access hospital
✅ Rural health clinic or federally qualified health center
✅ Skilled nursing facility
✅ Community mental health center
✅ Hospital-based or independent renal dialysis center
✅ Mobile stroke unit or other CMS-approved facility
✅ Patient’s home only if the service qualifies for a permanent exception such as specific behavioral health services.

Every telehealth note and claim must clearly document the patient’s exact location and the name of the qualifying facility.

Licensing is equally important.
The provider must hold an active license in the state where the patient is physically located at the time of the visit.
Example: A cardiologist licensed in New York who delivers a telehealth visit to a patient sitting in New Jersey must also be licensed (or hold a telehealth permit or compact privilege) in New Jersey, because New Jersey is the patient’s originating site.

Key tips:
• Capture the patient’s exact location in every telehealth note and on the billing claim
• Verify provider licensure or telehealth reciprocity for every state where patients may be located
• Maintain a crosswalk of provider licenses and patient locations in the credentialing system
• For multi-state practices, consider joining the Interstate Medical Licensure Compact to simplify multi-state licensing

2025 Billing & Coding Guide for Telehealth
Beyond CPT 98016, the AMA added a set of new 2025 CPT codes for telehealth, though CMS has not adopted them for Medicare payment. Practices need to know the difference between what exists in the CPT book and what CMS actually reimburses.

New CPT Telehealth Codes (2025)
• 98000–98007: synchronous audio-video telehealth E/M visits (new and established patients)
• 98008–98015: synchronous audio-only telehealth E/M visits (new and established patients)
• 98016: brief communication technology-based service (replaces G2012)

CMS Coverage Reality
• Medicare continues to require E/M codes 99202–99215 for telehealth office/outpatient visits.
• CMS does not cover 98000–98015 for standard telehealth visits.
• 98016 is the only newly recognized code, under the strict conditions noted above.

Billing Tips for 2025
✅ Use E/M codes 99202–99215 for full telehealth visits, with modifier 95 when video is used and the patient is at an approved originating site.
✅ For audio-only encounters allowed by CMS exceptions, use modifier 93 and document why video was not possible.
✅ Ensure the correct Place of Service (POS): POS 02 when the patient is at an approved site other than home, POS 10 when the patient is at home for an approved service.
✅ Remove deleted codes 99441–99443 from your charge-capture system to avoid denials.
✅ Keep payer-specific grids updated because some commercial plans or Medicaid programs may adopt 98000-series codes for their own telehealth coverage even if Medicare does not.

Operational and Financial Impact for Medical Practices
The new rules require careful changes to scheduling, documentation, and revenue-cycle management.
Scheduling and verification
Front-desk and scheduling teams must confirm that a Medicare patient will be physically present at an approved site before booking a telehealth slot. Quick screening questions and clear patient instructions will help prevent denials.
EHR updates and documentation
Electronic health records should capture the patient’s originating site for any telehealth encounter and provide fields for consent and time documentation when CPT 98016 is used. Clinicians should note when a call is strictly post-procedure monitoring so it is correctly bundled.
Revenue cycle and forecasting
Revenue-cycle teams need to remove 99441 to 99443 from charge capture systems, monitor denial trends, and adjust financial forecasts. Practices should plan for a reduction in telehealth revenue and a possible rise in in-person visits that require more staff and exam room time.
Patient communication
Patients who are accustomed to home-based telehealth will need clear explanations of the new requirements. Use portal messages, printed notices, and staff scripts to help patients understand why some phone check-ins can no longer be billed and why in-person visits may be necessary.
Compliance safeguards
Misusing CPT 98016 or continuing to bill deleted telephone codes creates audit risk. Practices should conduct internal chart reviews and provide ongoing staff education to ensure claims meet documentation standards.

Recommended Action Plan
To stay compliant and profitable, practices should begin preparing now.

1. Audit current telehealth services and identify encounters that rely on home-based visits or deleted codes
2. Update scheduling protocols so staff confirm patient location and payer eligibility before every telehealth appointment
3. Revise EHR templates to capture originating site, patient consent, and timing for CPT 98016
4. Educate clinicians and billers on the strict conditions for 98016 and proper use of modifier 25 when an E/M is performed the same day as a minor procedure
5. Communicate with patients about the new requirements and provide information on approved originating sites or alternative care options
6. Monitor denials and revenue trends and adjust budgets to reflect reduced telehealth income

The broad telehealth flexibilities of the pandemic allowed medical practices to reach patients in ways that once seemed impossible. Those flexibilities are ending. Beginning October 1, 2025, Medicare will require an approved originating site for most telehealth services, the familiar audio-only telephone codes are gone, and CPT 98016 stands as the sole brief communication code with strict usage limits.

Medical practices that act now will avoid claim denials and audit risk while preserving patient access. Audit policies, train staff, update EHR templates, and communicate proactively with patients. Aligning with the new rules not only keeps your practice compliant but also creates an opportunity to streamline workflows, strengthen revenue integrity, and build a sustainable hybrid-care model for the future.
By approaching this change with a clear strategy and disciplined execution, your organization can continue to deliver high-quality care and remain profitable in the new telehealth era.

References for Readers
Medicare Telehealth Coverage: https://www.medicare.gov/coverage/telehealth
HHS Telehealth Policy Updates: https://telehealth.hhs.gov/providers/telehealth-policy/telehealth-policy-updates
CMS MLN Telehealth & RPM Booklet: https://www.cms.gov/files/document/mln901705-telehealth-remote-patient-monitoring.pdf
NCCI Policy Manual 2025 – Modifier 25: https://www.cms.gov/files/document/01-chapter1-ncci-medicare-policy-manual-2025finalcleanpdf.pdf
AMA CPT 2025 Telehealth Update (includes 98000–98016): https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/cpt/how-ama-meets-need-new-telehealth-cpt-codes

​

About the Author
​
Pinky Maniri-Pescasio is the CEO and Founder of GoHealthcare Practice Solutions LLC, a nationally recognized consulting firm specializing in medical billing, revenue cycle management, and healthcare operations. With nearly 30 years of healthcare leadership experience, she has guided physician groups, specialty clinics, multi-site practices, and ambulatory surgery centers through complex regulatory changes, coding updates, and large-scale operational transformations.
Pinky is known for turning complex policy into clear, actionable strategies that keep medical practices compliant and profitable. She leads organizations through CMS rule updates, CPT code changes, and telehealth policy shifts—most recently helping practices prepare for the October 1, 2025 Medicare telehealth transition.
Beyond consulting, Pinky is a sought-after speaker and thought leader, mentoring medical-practice executives and championing clarity and innovation in healthcare revenue cycle management.
Connect with Pinky to stay ahead of regulatory changes and build a stronger, more profitable medical practice.

How does the global period affect billing for orthopedic procedures?

Answer:
The global period is the timeframe during which post-procedure care is included in the original surgical fee. It varies:

• 0-day global period: No follow-up care included.
• 10-day global period: Minor procedures, with routine care included for 10 days.
• 90-day global period: Major procedures, with post-op visits included for 90 days.

Billing errors occur when:

• A provider bills separately for services already included in the global package.
• Post-op visits require modifier -24 (unrelated E/M service during the global period).
• Unrelated procedures require modifier -79 to indicate a new issue.

Understanding global periods prevents denials and incorrect billing.

Why Pain Management Practices Need AI Now
​
Pain management sits at the intersection of medicine, economics, and human suffering. Chronic pain affects more than 50 million Americans, making it the leading cause of long-term disability in the United States. Behind every statistic is a patient struggling to walk, work, or simply enjoy daily life. Interventional pain management procedures—medial branch blocks, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), spinal cord stimulation, epidural steroid injections, and more—offer hope and measurable relief.
But if we zoom out from the exam room to the operations of a pain management practice, the picture looks different. What should be a golden era of demand for pain specialists has become a battlefield of shrinking reimbursements, payer scrutiny, and rising compliance burdens.

The challenges are real:

• Complex payer requirements: A single missing percentage of documented pain relief can cost thousands in denials.
• Time-consuming prior authorizations: Staff are drowning in paperwork and repetitive calls.
• Unpredictable revenue cycles: Denials, underpayments, and delayed reimbursements choke cash flow.
• Patient frustrations: Long waits, confusing billing, and lack of engagement erode trust.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) enters this picture not as a luxury, but as a necessity. No longer confined to Silicon Valley or academic labs, AI is here—and it’s already reshaping how pain practices operate. By automating repetitive processes, ensuring compliance, preventing denials, improving imaging precision, and personalizing patient care, AI has become the quiet force enabling practices to thrive in an unforgiving healthcare landscape.
Pain practices that adopt AI today will not just endure—they’ll lead. They’ll deliver care faster, protect revenue, and build reputations as innovative, patient-centered leaders.​

The Business and Clinical Realities of Pain Practices

​Running a modern pain practice requires far more than clinical expertise. It requires operational mastery.
Procedures such as medial branch blocks, kyphoplasty, or spinal cord stimulation change lives. But they are also high-value, high-scrutiny services in the payer world. Because of their cost, insurers impose strict documentation rules, and any deviation invites denial.

Consider RFA. Medicare and commercial payers often require two diagnostic medial branch blocks showing at least 80% pain relief before RFA approval. If a provider documents “patient had good relief” without quantifying it, the claim will likely be denied—even if the patient’s outcome was excellent. That one oversight may cost the practice thousands of dollars.
Multiply this scenario by dozens of patients each month, and you see the scale of the problem. A practice performing 200 procedures per month at $2,000 each generates $400,000 in monthly revenue. If just 10% are denied due to documentation gaps, that’s $40,000 lost monthly—or nearly half a million annually.
This is not about poor clinical care. It’s about administrative bottlenecks that bleed revenue and frustrate both patients and providers. Small front-office teams struggle to keep pace. Physicians feel undermined when medical decisions are questioned. Patients are left in limbo.
This is exactly the environment AI was designed to transform.​

Denials Management and Prevention

Denials are one of the most destructive forces in pain management. The Healthcare Financial Management Association (HFMA) reports that 10–20% of all claims are denied on first submission. For pain practices, where the average claim may be several thousand dollars, the impact is magnified.
Many practices underestimate their true losses because denials often end up written off or stuck in endless appeals.
AI changes this dynamic by moving from a reactive to proactive model. Instead of waiting for denials, AI systems review documentation and coding before the claim is submitted.

• Submitting CPT 63650 (spinal cord stimulator trial) without psychological clearance? AI flags it instantly.
  
• Filing a kyphoplasty without MRI or CT confirmation of compression fracture? The system prompts staff to attach it.
  
• Claiming CPT 64483 (lumbar epidural injection) with mismatched ICD-10 codes? AI detects the discrepancy and corrects it.
  
  

The results are transformative. First-pass acceptance rates rise, cash flow stabilizes, and staff spend less time chasing appeals. Some practices report denial reductions of 50% or more. For a practice performing 200 procedures monthly, halving denials can add $200,000 or more annually to the bottom line.
Even more importantly, patients don’t experience treatment delays while staff battle insurers. Denial prevention is not just financial—it’s about access to timely care.​

Imaging and Diagnostics

Pain management relies heavily on imaging—fluoroscopy, CT, MRI—to diagnose conditions and guide interventions. But human interpretation, no matter how skilled, is vulnerable to fatigue and oversight.
AI enhances accuracy by serving as a second set of eyes. Algorithms trained on millions of cases can:

• Detect subtle vertebral fractures.
• Highlight degenerative disc changes or Modic endplate inflammation.
• Confirm needle placement in real time during RFA or injections.
• Monitor post-op scans for hardware issues or adjacent level disease.

This doesn’t replace physicians—it empowers them. AI highlights what might otherwise be missed, helping clinicians make faster, safer, and more precise decisions. Patients benefit through improved outcomes and reduced complications.
In practice, AI-driven imaging tools can mean fewer repeat procedures, shorter recovery times, and higher patient satisfaction.

Revenue Cycle Automation
The revenue cycle is the financial engine of a pain practice. From eligibility checks to charge capture, coding, submission, payment posting, and reconciliation—any weak link can cause revenue leakage.
AI strengthens every step:

• Eligibility verification: Instant checks reduce scheduling delays.
• AI-assisted coding: Ensures CPT and ICD-10 codes align perfectly with documentation.
• Payment posting: Identifies underpayments automatically.
• Predictive analytics: Forecasts revenue and highlights risky payers.
  
  

Example: if a payer consistently reimburses 8% below contract for certain injections, AI flags it, giving administrators leverage in payer negotiations.
For mid-sized practices, AI-driven automation can save hundreds of thousands annually, while reducing the administrative workload that often burns out staff.​​

Patient Experience in AI-Enabled Pain Practices
Patients measure their experience holistically—not just by pain relief but by how they were treated throughout the journey. Long waits, unclear instructions, and billing confusion can overshadow clinical excellence.

AI enhances the patient journey in several ways:

• Intelligent scheduling optimizes appointments, reducing wait times.
• Virtual assistants and chatbots provide 24/7 support with prep instructions, FAQs, and recovery tips.
• Remote patient monitoring tracks recovery metrics like pain scores, mobility, and sleep.
  
  

Take Maria, a 62-year-old with spinal stenosis. Before AI, she endured weeks of waiting and constant phone tag with the office. After AI adoption, she was scheduled quickly, received clear text reminders, and her wearable device flagged a post-op mobility decline early. Her care team intervened, avoiding hospitalization.
The outcome wasn’t just medical—it was emotional. Maria felt cared for and became a vocal advocate for the practice.
That’s the power of AI in patient engagement: better care, stronger trust, and higher retention.​

Compliance and Governance

Pain management is a compliance minefield. CMS regulations, HIPAA requirements, and payer audits create constant pressure.

AI strengthens compliance by embedding rules directly into workflows:

• Missing LCD criteria? AI halts the claim.
• PHI transmitted insecurely? AI blocks the action.
• Documentation incomplete for RFA? AI prompts correction before submission.
  
  

But AI must also be governed. Practices need frameworks to audit AI outputs, ensure fairness, and maintain physician oversight. Transparency is essential—AI should be a trusted partner, not a black box.
With governance in place, AI becomes a compliance ally rather than a risk.

Financial ROI of AI in Pain Practices

Every practice leader asks: what’s the return? For AI, the ROI is both direct and indirect.

Direct ROI:

• A practice with 100 monthly procedures at $2,000 each generates $2.4M annually.
• If 10% of claims are denied, that’s $240,000 lost.
• Cutting denials in half saves $120,000 annually.

Indirect ROI:

• Faster payments improve cash flow.
• Underpayment detection protects against hidden revenue losses.
• Staff time saved can be redeployed to growth initiatives.
• Happier patients generate more referrals.
  
  

For larger groups, the numbers grow exponentially. A high-volume practice performing 500 procedures monthly could save half a million dollars annually with AI adoption.

When measured over 3–5 years, AI easily returns several times its cost, making it one of the smartest investments a pain practice can make.

The Future of Pain Practices with AI

The next five years will accelerate AI’s role in pain management:

• Predictive analytics will guide treatment selection, ensuring patients receive the right intervention at the right time.
• Robotics combined with AI will improve precision in minimally invasive procedures.
• Population health tools will forecast regional pain trends, guiding workforce and resource planning.
• Value-based contracts will reward practices for efficiency and outcomes, powered by AI data.

Pain practices that embrace AI now will be the ones shaping these contracts, not just reacting to them.


Key Takeaways

Pain practices are vital to modern healthcare. They restore function, relieve suffering, and improve quality of life. But they also face unprecedented operational and financial challenges.

AI provides the tools to overcome them:

• Denial prevention protects revenue.
• Imaging support improves accuracy.
• Revenue cycle automation stabilizes cash flow.
• Patient engagement tools build trust.
• Compliance frameworks reduce audit risk.
  
  

The practices that adopt AI today will become the leaders of tomorrow. They will set the standard for smarter operations, stronger revenue, and happier patients.
Now is the time to embrace AI in pain management.​

About the Author:

Pinky Maniri-Pescasio
​MSc, CRCR, CSAPM, CSPPM, CSBI, CSPR, CSAF, Certified in A.I. Governanceis the Founder and CEO of GoHealthcare Practice Solutions, LLC and the COO of GoHealthcare AI Solutions, LLC, where she leads national initiatives to modernize healthcare operations through Artificial Intelligence, compliance strategies, and revenue cycle mastery. With nearly three decades of experience in U.S. healthcare, she has become a trusted advisor to physicians, practice leaders, and hospital executives across the country.
Pinky holds multiple certifications in revenue cycle, practice management, and AI governance. She is a nationally recognized speaker on topics such as payer negotiations, AI-driven revenue cycle management, and strategies for interventional pain and spine practices.
Her mission is clear: to empower medical practices with smarter operations, stronger revenue streams, and cutting-edge AI solutions—transforming the way healthcare is delivered and experienced.
When she’s not advising practices or speaking at national conferences, Pinky mentors entrepreneurs and invests her energy in building companies that will shape the future of healthcare.
Connect with her at:
🌐 www.gohealthcarellc.com
📞 800-267-8752
🔗 LinkedIn: Pinky Maniri-Pescasio

A comprehensive guide for SCS, DRG, DBS, PNS, Intracept, Kyphoplasty, RFAs, and MBBs

The hidden procedure before the procedure
Prior authorization (PA) is the invisible procedure that determines whether patients access the interventions that can change their lives. For interventional pain practices, the path to approval is not just administrative—it is clinical, financial, and strategic.

The highest-value procedures; Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS), Dorsal Root Ganglion (DRG) stimulation, Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS), Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS), Intracept (basivertebral nerve ablation), Kyphoplasty, Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA), and Medial Branch Blocks (MBBs) are under the most intense payer scrutiny. That scrutiny isn’t going away.
​
This guide gives you a full playbook to win approvals consistently and ethically. You’ll learn the medical-necessity story payers want to see, the exact documentation that moves a submission from “pending” to “approved,” the coding that keeps claims clean, and the operational workflows that scale without burning out your team. Use it to tighten your processes, reduce days-to-decision, and protect margins—while getting patients the right care at the right time.​

1) Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) & Dorsal Root Ganglion (DRG) Stimulation

Why payers scrutinize it?
SCS/DRG is high-ticket and high-impact. Payers will approve when there is proof of refractory neuropathic pain, clear alignment to policy criteria, and a successful trial. The stronger your clinical narrative, the faster the approval.
Core medical-necessity themes

• Qualifying diagnoses: Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS), Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS I/II), post-laminectomy syndrome, causalgia, refractory radiculopathy/neuropathic limb pain.
• Duration and refractoriness: Typically ≥6 months of persistent pain despite guideline-concordant conservative therapy.
• Trial success: Most policies require a temporary trial demonstrating ≥50% improvement in pain and/or function before permanent implant.
• Psychological readiness: Many payers require formal psych evaluation to reduce non-response risk and to confirm realistic expectations.

Documentation checklist (submission-ready)

1. Problem list & diagnoses: ICD-10 specificity matching clinical notes.
2. Conservative care chronology: Medications, PT, behavioral health, injections—dates, durations, outcomes, intolerances.
3. Imaging: MRI/CT correlating pathology to symptoms; attach full reports.
4. Functional measures: ODI/NDI, PROMIS, gait/function notes; pre- and post-trial metrics.
5. Trial report: Lead levels/placement, days of trial, objective improvement (≥50%), activity tolerance, analgesic changes.
6. Psych evaluation: Summary with conclusion on suitability and adherence risk.
7. Comorbidity profile: Smoking status, diabetes control, prior infections; mitigation steps if relevant.
8. Attestations & consent: Shared decision-making documented.

Coding (trial vs permanent)

• Trial: 63650 – Percutaneous implantation of neurostimulator electrode array, epidural.
• Permanent (correct permanent codes):
  • 63650 – Percutaneous permanent lead (when no paddle is used).
  • 63655 – Laminectomy for implantation of paddle lead, epidural.
  • 63685 – Insertion or replacement of spinal neurostimulator pulse generator or receiver.

Revisions, removals, and replacements have distinct codes; verify current descriptors in the CPT codebook for those scenarios.
Frequent denial triggers & how to avoid them

• Conservative care not fully documented → Provide a dated timeline with outcomes/intolerances.
• Trial benefit not quantified → Include baseline vs. post-trial pain/function with numeric scales, activity examples, and medication changes.
• Missing psych clearance → Attach the report; if not required by policy, cite the policy language in your cover note.

Appeal phrasing that works (sample)“The patient demonstrated a 60% reduction in VAS pain and a 55% improvement in ODI during a 7-day trial with increased walking tolerance from 5 to 25 minutes and decreased short-acting opioid use from 40 to 10 MME/day. These outcomes meet and exceed policy criteria for a successful trial, following ≥6 months of structured non-surgical care. We respectfully request overturn of the denial and approval for permanent implantation.”
Operational tips

• Use a trial-to-perm tracker so staff can auto-generate the permanent PA packet with the trial metrics.
• Create a psych referral fast lane with templated questions tailored to SCS/DRG readiness.
• Build a post-trial metrics tool (simple spreadsheet is fine) capturing pain/function/meds to drop into the PA cover letter.

2) Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) & Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) DBS: when pain intersects with movement-disorder policyDBS policies are historically oriented to Parkinson’s disease, essential tremor, and dystonia. For pain, payers are stricter, often labeling off-label indications investigational unless specific criteria are met.

DBS approval patterns

• Multidisciplinary evaluation: Neurology and neurosurgery sign-off.
• Imaging: MRI/CT demonstrating anatomical candidacy and absence of contraindications.
• Functional impairment: ADL limitations, medication failures, and prior treatment outcomes.
• Team consensus: Documented case conference or two-specialist agreement.

DBS coding (common families)

• 61863–61888: Cranial neurostimulator electrode placement, connection, and pulse generator services (exact code depends on approach, laterality, and number of leads/generator actions). Always verify specifics in current CPT.

DBS documentation must-haves

• Neurologist evaluation, surgical candidacy notes, and risk-benefit counseling.
• Objective scales (e.g., UPDRS, tremor ratings) where relevant; for pain, include validated pain/functional indices and prior neuromodulation attempts (if any).
• Clear medical-necessity rationale tying symptoms to expected response.

PNS: focused neural targets, focused documentation. PNS is increasingly used for occipital neuralgia, peripheral neuropathic pain, and post-surgical nerve pain syndromes. Payers want an anatomic story that matches the target nerve and demonstrates failure of conservative care.

PNS approval themes

• Precise target: Correlation of pain distribution with the nerve to be stimulated.
• Conservative care: Meds, PT, targeted injections/blocks with limited or temporary benefit.
• Trial (if required): Quantified pain/function improvement.

PNS coding (common)

• 64555 – Percutaneous implantation of peripheral nerve stimulator electrode array.
• 64590 – Insertion or replacement of peripheral neurostimulator pulse generator.

Additional PNS codes may apply based on device/system and surgical approach.
PNS documentation checklist

• Pain map and neuro exam correlating to the named nerve.
• Prior blocks and their effects (duration/percent relief).
• Photos or diagrams (in EHR) can help reviewers visualize the target/coverage.
• Device selection rationale (lead type, external vs implanted trial).

Avoidable denials

• “Nonspecific neuropathy” without anatomic correlation → Add a clear nerve-distribution narrative and exam findings.
• Trial data omitted → Include % relief, function gains, and medication shifts during trial (if policy requires a trial).

3) Intracept (Basivertebral Nerve Ablation)
The vertebrogenic pain storyIntracept treats chronic vertebrogenic low back pain mediated by the basivertebral nerve in vertebral endplates with Modic changes. Payers are increasingly aware but vary widely—some label it medically necessary under specific criteria, others keep it under investigational review.
Typical approval criteria

• Chronic axial low back pain ≥6 months despite comprehensive conservative management (analgesics, activity modification, PT, and often CBT or multidisciplinary rehab).
• Imaging proof: MRI with Modic Type 1 or 2 changes at L3–S1 correlating with symptoms.
• Exclusions: Significant instability, severe stenosis with neurogenic claudication, symptomatic spondylolisthesis beyond mild, or active infection/tumor.
• Psychological and functional assessment: Many payers consider psychosocial risk factors.

Coding

• 64628 – Thermal destruction of intraosseous basivertebral nerve, first vertebral body.
• 64629 – Each additional vertebral body.

Documentation blueprint

1. MRI report highlighting Modic type and levels; include images or full radiology text.
2. Pain localization narrative (midline axial pain vs radicular symptoms).
3. Failed conservative care chronology (≥6 months) with outcomes.
4. Functional measures (e.g., ODI) and activity limitations.
5. Surgeon’s rationale linking Modic changes to symptoms and expected response.

Common denial rationales & counters

• “Investigational/experimental” → Provide current society guidelines and outcomes data; emphasize patient selection fit.
• “Insufficient conservative care” → Attach a timeline with distinct modalities and durations; include PT notes and medication trials.
• “Imaging not conclusive” → Ensure the MRI report explicitly states Modic type 1 or 2 at named levels and correlates with exam findings.

Operational pearls

• Use a Modic screen form at consult: level(s), type, radiologist confirmation, and symptom correlation.
• Build an Intracept packet template with pre-filled criteria checkboxes and places to paste MRI excerpts.

4) Kyphoplasty (Percutaneous vertebral augmentation)

What payers expect:
Kyphoplasty is usually approved for acute or subacute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures where conservative treatment failed and imaging confirms acuity. Commercial payers often mirror Medicare themes but may add time windows or distinct criteria.

Approval criteria patterns

• Acute or subacute fracture confirmed by imaging (MRI edema/STIR signal or bone scan uptake).
• Refractory pain despite analgesics, bracing, limited activity, and possibly PT.
• Localization: Pain correlates anatomically with the fractured level(s).
• Exclusions: Asymptomatic fractures, fractures with significant posterior wall retropulsion causing canal compromise, or neoplastic lesions without specific indications.

Coding

• 22513 – Percutaneous vertebral augmentation (thoracic or lumbar), first vertebral body.
• 22515 – Each additional vertebral body.

Cervical levels and tumor-related augmentation may have different coding/policy considerations.
Documentation essentials

• Radiology report confirming fracture acuity and level(s).
• Pain onset/date of injury, aggravating factors, and neurologic status.
• Conservative care summary (meds, bracing type/duration, functional restrictions).
• Correlation of exam findings with the level treated.

Denials to anticipate

• “Pain not correlated to fracture” → Add specific exam findings (percussion tenderness) and level correlation.
• “Insufficient conservative care” → Clarify the timeframe and why conservative measures failed (e.g., immobility risk, severe pain despite medication).
• “Imaging not acute” → Ensure the MRI report includes edema or equivalent signs of acuity.

Appeal language (sample)
“Imaging confirms acute edema at T12 with concordant localized pain and failed analgesic/bracing over four weeks. The patient’s prolonged immobility risks deconditioning and pulmonary complications. Given clear clinical-radiographic correlation, kyphoplasty is medically necessary and consistent with payer policy criteria.”

5) Medial Branch Blocks (MBBs) & Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA)

Why the two-step matters:
Policies commonly require diagnostic MBBs to confirm facet-mediated pain before therapeutic RFA. Documentation has to prove the facet joints are the pain generator, not discs or myofascial sources.

MBB approval & documentation

• Target clarity: Cervical, thoracic, or lumbar levels; laterality.
• Baseline pain/function: Numeric rating scales and activity limits.
• Block response: Most policies require ≥80% relief after diagnostic blocks; some require two positive blocks separated in time.
• Pain diary: Timed entries (pre-block, immediate post, hours 2–8, day 1–2) with activity notes.

RFA approval & frequency

• Two successful MBBs in many commercial policies; some allow one with stringent conditions.
• Frequency limits: Often no more than twice per rolling 12 months per region; exact intervals vary by payer.
• Repeat RFA: Must document durable benefit from prior RFA (e.g., 6–12 months of relief).

Coding

• MBB: 64490–64492 (cervical/thoracic), 64493–64495 (lumbar/sacral), with appropriate laterality and levels.
• RFA: 64633–64634 (cervical/thoracic), 64635–64636 (lumbar/sacral).

Sedation/anesthesia with these procedures is payer-sensitive; many policies consider moderate sedation not routinely necessary and may deny it without clear justification.
​
Common denial pitfalls

• Relief recorded as “better” without quantification → Use percentage + function (e.g., “85% with ability to stand for 30 minutes vs 5 minutes baseline”).
• Missing second diagnostic block where required → Track policy by payer and patient.
• Sedation billed routinely → Add explicit clinical justification or remove if not indicated.

Appeal tip
Create a one-page facet pain evidence sheet for reviewers: baseline scores, exact relief percentages and timestamps, functional changes, and why RFA is the logical next step.

6) Universal PA workflow: from consult to authorization to procedure
A tight, repeatable workflow beats heroics. Build a process your team can run every day, regardless of who’s out sick or which payer is on the line.

A. Intake & benefits verification

• Confirm plan type (Medicare FFS vs Medicare Advantage vs commercial vs WC/MVA).
• Identify precert vendor (eviCore, TurningPoint, AIM, internal plan team) and submission channel.
• Check site-of-service rules (ASC, HOPD, office), network status, and pre/post-op imaging requirements.

B. Clinical documentation assembly

• Use procedure-specific checklists (SCS/DRG, DBS/PNS, Intracept, Kypho, MBB/RFA).
• Pull full radiology reports, not excerpts.
• Capture functional scales at baseline and key milestones (post-trial, post-block).

C. Submission

• Include a cover letter mapping your case to policy bullet-by-bullet.
• Attach all supporting notes in a logical order: problem list → chronology of conservative care → imaging → functional measures → procedure-specific evidence (trial or block results) → psych eval (if required) → consent.

D. Tracking & escalation

• Log date/time submitted and expected decision window by payer.
• If “pended,” respond same day with requested information.
• If denied, request peer-to-peer immediately and schedule within the appeal clock.

E. Post-decision

• Upon approval: verify authorization number, CPT/diagnosis codes, date range, and site of service before scheduling.
• Upon denial: launch tiered appeal—internal reconsideration → external review where applicable. Keep templates ready.

People, roles, and metrics

• A PA lead owns payer relationships and policy updates.
• Case managers prepare packets and handle follow-ups.
• A coding specialist audits CPT/ICD pairings and NCCI edits.
• Weekly metrics: submissions, approvals, denials, days-to-decision, appeal overturn rate, payer-specific denial reasons.

7) Denial management & appeals: turn “no” into “yes”

Denials are data. Track them, categorize them, and respond with precision.

Most frequent denial categories

1. Insufficient conservative care → Provide a dated, modality-by-modality timeline with outcomes or intolerances.
2. Outcome threshold not met (trial or MBB) → Re-present the data with exact percentages and functional gains; correct any documentation gaps.
3. Investigational/not medically necessary → Provide society guidelines, published outcomes, selection criteria, and the patient’s fit.
4. Coding mismatch → Align CPT/ICD with the clinical story and site of service; address bundling edits.
5. Missing psych clearance (SCS/DRG) → Add report, or specify policy language if not required.

Appeal structure

• Header: Patient, ID, auth number, date of denial, procedure.
• Executive summary: One paragraph stating medical necessity and policy alignment.
• Clinical narrative: Problem progression, failed therapies, imaging, functional impact.
• Policy mapping: Bullet-for-bullet alignment to criteria.
• Outcome evidence: Trial or block results with numeric improvements.
• Request: Clear ask for approval or overturn.

8) Scaling approvals: systems, training, and quality

Build procedure playbooks

• For each procedure, create a five-page internal SOP: criteria summary, checklist, common denials, appeal templates, and a sample winning cover letter.

Train quarterly

• Refresh staff on new LCDs, payer policy updates, and coding changes.
• Host mock peer-to-peers to practice crisp clinical storytelling.

Automate where possible

• Use simple forms to standardize the collection of trial outcomes, pain diaries, and functional scores.
• Maintain a payer policy library with the latest criteria and quick-reference matrices.

Measure what matters

• Approval rate (overall and by procedure).
• Days-to-decision and days-to-schedule.
• Appeal overturn rate and root-cause taxonomy of denials.
• Physician satisfaction (internal) and patient time-to-care (external).

Leverage your results

• Share de-identified approval metrics with referral sources.
• Present policy-aligned case studies in newsletters and at conferences.
• Use your documented results to negotiate better contracts or pre-approval pathways.

9) Procedure-specific quick reference (copy-paste checklists):

SCS/DRG – Prior auth packet checklist

• Dx and ICD-10 specificity.
• ≥6 months conservative care timeline with outcomes/intolerances.
• MRI/CT correlating pathology to symptoms.
• Psych evaluation summary (if required).
• Trial operative report with ≥50% improvement in pain/function and any medication reduction.
• Consent and shared decision-making note.
• Codes: 63650 (trial and/or percutaneous perm lead), 63655 (paddle lead via laminectomy), 63685 (IPG).

DBS – Prior auth packet checklist

• Neurology and neurosurgery evaluations.
• Imaging confirming candidacy.
• Functional impairment scales and treatment history.
• Team consensus documentation.
• Codes: 61863–61888 (verify exact code by approach/lead/generator).

PNS – Prior auth packet checklist

• Named target nerve(s) with pain map and exam correlation.
• Conservative care failures and any diagnostic block results.
• Trial results (if required) with quantified improvement.
• Device/lead rationale.
• Codes: 64555 (percutaneous electrode array), 64590 (IPG).

Intracept – Prior auth packet checklist

• MRI report confirming Modic type 1 or 2 at named levels (L3–S1).
• Axial pain description without radicular dominance.
• ≥6 months comprehensive conservative care.
• ODI or similar function scale; work/activity limitations.
• Surgeon’s selection rationale.
• Codes: 64628, 64629.

Kyphoplasty – Prior auth packet checklist

• Imaging confirming acute/subacute fracture and level(s).
• Pain correlation and percussion tenderness notes.
• Conservative care efforts (analgesics, bracing, activity mods) and failure.
• Risk considerations (immobility, comorbidities).
• Codes: 22513, 22515.

MBB/RFA – Prior auth packet checklist

• Facet pain narrative (levels, laterality, provocative maneuvers).
• Baseline pain/function scores.
• Diagnostic block logs with timestamps and ≥80% relief (as policy requires); two blocks if required.
• RFA plan with prior relief duration if repeating.
• Sedation justification (if billed).
• Codes: MBB 64490–64495; RFA 64633–64636.

10) Compliance, ethics, and documentation integrity

Strong PA performance is inseparable from compliance. Avoid upcoding, mislabeling trials as permanent, or over-stating outcomes. Make time for internal audits:

• Quarterly documentation audits by procedure.
• Peer education for providers whose notes repeatedly trigger denials.
• Policy attestation: Keep a signed copy of each payer’s current criteria in your policy library with the effective date.

Ethical alignment isn’t just the right thing—it increases reviewer trust and improves approval velocity over time.

Make PA your competitive edge
In interventional pain, prior authorization is as critical as procedural skill. When your documentation mirrors policy, your coding tells a precise story, and your workflows are disciplined, your approval rates rise and denials fall. Patients move to treatment faster, physicians spend less time fighting paperwork, and your practice safeguards both outcomes and margins.
Build the discipline once, and benefit on every case thereafter. Standardize your checklists, track your metrics, train your team, and keep your policy library current. With those pillars in place, even the most complex procedures—SCS/DRG, DBS, PNS, Intracept, Kyphoplasty, MBBs, and RFAs—become predictable, repeatable wins.

FAQ 5: What Role Does Patient Engagement Play in a Pain Management Practice?

Engaging patients in their own care is essential for the success of any pain management strategy. Active patient engagement leads to better adherence to treatment plans, improved satisfaction, and ultimately, more effective pain management outcomes.

Key Elements of Patient Engagement:

1. Education and Empowerment:
   • Comprehensive Information:
     Provide patients with detailed information about their condition, treatment options, and potential side effects. Educational materials, such as brochures, videos, and online resources, can empower patients to take an active role in their care.
   • Interactive Patient Portals:
     Patient portals offer a secure platform where patients can access their health records, view treatment plans, schedule appointments, and communicate with their care team. This not only enhances transparency but also builds trust.
2. Communication and Feedback:
   • Regular Check-Ins:
     Establish regular follow-up routines—via phone calls, emails, or virtual visits—to assess patient progress and address any concerns promptly.
   • Surveys and Questionnaires:
     Use patient satisfaction surveys and feedback forms to gauge the effectiveness of your pain management strategies. This input is invaluable for continuous improvement.
3. Personalized Care:
   • Tailored Treatment Plans:
     Leverage data from EHRs and patient feedback to create personalized treatment plans. By addressing the unique needs and preferences of each patient, clinics can improve adherence and outcomes.
   • Incorporation of Alternative Therapies:
     For many patients, a combination of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments (such as physical therapy, acupuncture, or counseling) yields the best results. Engaging patients in discussions about alternative therapies can enhance their overall care experience.
4. Use of Technology:
   • Mobile Health Applications:
     Mobile apps that allow patients to track their pain levels, medication usage, and daily activities can provide real-time insights. This data can be shared with providers, facilitating timely interventions.
   • Telemedicine for Follow-Ups:
     Virtual consultations enable ongoing patient engagement, particularly for those who may have mobility or transportation challenges.

Benefits of Enhanced Patient Engagement:
When patients are actively involved in their treatment:

• Adherence Improves: Patients are more likely to follow prescribed treatment regimens when they understand the benefits and risks.
• Better Outcomes: Engaged patients often report reduced pain levels and improved quality of life.
• Stronger Provider-Patient Relationships: Open communication fosters trust and satisfaction, which are critical for long-term treatment success.

Case Study:
A mid-sized pain management clinic implemented a comprehensive patient engagement program that included a new patient portal, regular educational webinars, and a mobile app for tracking progress. Over the course of a year, the clinic observed a 20% improvement in treatment adherence and a significant reduction in missed follow-up appointments. Patients reported feeling more connected to their care team, and the clinic experienced fewer billing issues related to missed appointments or miscommunications.

What Is the WISeR Model?
In a groundbreaking effort to curb waste, fraud, and abuse (FWA) in Medicare, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has unveiled the Wasteful and Inappropriate Service Reduction (WISeR) Model, a six-year, technology-powered initiative aimed at revolutionizing prior authorization for select Medicare Part B items and services. This forward-thinking model, spearheaded by the CMS Innovation Center, will leverage artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and algorithmic logic to streamline prior authorization and safeguard Medicare dollars—without sacrificing patient care quality.
​
Beginning January 1, 2026, WISeR is designed to:

• Prevent unnecessary or non-covered services
• Accelerate prior auth decisions via tech-enabled platforms
• Engage private-sector innovations from Medicare Advantage (MA) in Original Medicare
• Shift from retrospective audits to proactive care quality assurance

If your organization delivers or bills for high-cost Medicare Part B services especially in pain management, orthopedic surgery, neurology, or wound care you need to understand WISeR now. This isn’t just a policy experiment—it’s the start of a systemic shift in how Medicare will enforce compliance, control spending, and reward tech-aligned providers.

Why WISeR Matters Now:
A Costly Landscape Ripe for ReformHealthcare waste is a $1 trillion problem, with an estimated 25% of U.S. healthcare spending attributed to waste, fraud, or abuse. According to studies cited in the WISeR RFA:

• In 2022 alone, Medicare spent up to $5.8 billion on low-value services.
• Civil settlements related to fraud exceeded $1.8 billion in 2023.
• Some unnecessary services led to 6,700 premature deaths among Medicare beneficiaries.

This isn’t just financial—it's a clinical crisis. Overuse of invasive, ineffective, or low-value care not only drains federal resources but puts patient safety at risk.

CMS has made it clear: the goal is to proactively block medically unnecessary services—especially those historically tied to waste or abuse—and redirect patients to higher-value, evidence-based alternatives.

The Vision Behind WISeR:
AI, Accountability & Equity
The WISeR model represents a significant departure from traditional CMS programs.

Here’s what makes it distinct:
✅ 1. Technology-Enhanced Decision Making
CMS will partner with private-sector tech firms especially those experienced with Medicare Advantage—to deploy enhanced platforms that use:

• Artificial Intelligence (AI)
• Machine Learning (ML)
• Predictive analytics
• Clinical decision support algorithms

These tools will accelerate the prior authorization process while maintaining accuracy and ensuring alignment with Local Coverage Determinations (LCDs) and National Coverage Determinations (NCDs).

✅ 2. Performance-Based Payment for Tech Vendors
Instead of fee-for-service, tech vendors selected to run WISeR in various regions will be paid a percentage of cost savings generated from non-affirmed claims. If a provider's request for an unnecessary service is denied and not overturned, the tech partner shares in that cost avoidance.

This new "savings-based compensation" model introduces aligned incentives between CMS and technology partners.

✅ 3. Provider Participation with Compliance Incentives
While providers aren’t required to submit prior auths, failing to do so for selected services may trigger prepayment medical review; a risk many organizations can’t afford. CMS is also exploring “Gold Carding” exemptions, rewarding compliant providers with fast-track approvals or prior auth exemptions.

Geographic Scope: 
Where WISeR Will Launch First
WISeR will launch in six states across four Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) jurisdictions:

MAC JurisdictionStates Included:
JL (Novitas)
📌 New Jersey
J15 (CGS)
📌 Ohio
JH (Novitas)
📌 Texas, Oklahoma
JF (Noridian)
📌 Arizona, Washington

These regions were selected based on utilization, volume of high-cost services, and fraud risk profiles. CMS will select one tech vendor per jurisdiction, with potential expansion in future phases.

What Services Will Require Prior Authorization Under WISeR?
​WISeR will start with a focused list of high-cost, high-risk services prone to overuse or fraud. These services span neurology, interventional pain, orthopedic, wound care, and urology specialties.

📋 Initial CPTs and Services Targeted (Performance Year 1):

• Spinal Cord Stimulators & Neuromodulation
• Epidural Steroid Injections (ESIs)
• Cervical Spinal Fusion
• Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation (Vertebroplasty/Kyphoplasty)
• Arthroscopic Debridement of the Knee
• Skin & Tissue Substitutes (Wound Care)
• Deep Brain Stimulation & Vagus Nerve Stimulation
• Incontinence Devices & Impotence Treatment
• Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Sleep Apnea

These are services that often come with clinical gray areas, complex documentation requirements, and historically high denial rates.

Prior Authorization Process Under WISeR: What Changes?
The WISeR prior auth process streamlines provider interactions via tech platforms or MACs and introduces a dual-pathway model:

Reviewed by WISeR participant.

• Flagged for prepayment review by MAC
• Notification to provider + patientPayment may be denied or delayed
• Provisional affirmation = guaranteed claim payment (if billed correctly)
• Additional documentation may be required
• Providers can submit PA requests via electronic portals, fax, mail, or phone.
• For non-affirmed requests, peer-to-peer review and unlimited resubmission options are available.

📌 WISeR Prior Authorization Requirements Based on Place of Service (POS)
The Weighting-Indicated Site-of-Service Reform (WISeR) Model, developed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), is a new prior authorization model that will officially go into effect on January 1, 2026.
This model introduces site-of-service-specific prior authorization (PA) requirements that depend entirely on the Place of Service (POS) code submitted on the claim. CMS is implementing WISeR to shift certain procedures to lower-cost settings and promote transparency in where care is delivered.

🛑 Which POS Codes Require Prior Authorization?
Under the WISeR Model, prior authorization will be required for procedures performed in facility settings, specifically:

• POS 22 – On-Campus Outpatient Hospital:
  Requires prior authorization. This is considered a high-cost setting. Providers must submit documentation to justify why the procedure cannot be safely performed in a lower-cost site like the physician’s office.
• POS 24 – Ambulatory Surgical Center (ASC):
  Requires prior authorization. Even though ASCs are often more efficient than hospitals, CMS includes them in the list of facility settings subject to PA under WISeR.
• POS 19 – Off-Campus Outpatient Hospital:
  Requires prior authorization. This is treated similarly to POS 22. Any procedures performed here will need justification and are subject to utilization management.

✅ Which POS Code Is Exempt from Prior Authorization?

• POS 11 – Office:
  Prior authorization is not required under the WISeR Model when the procedure is performed in a physician’s office. CMS is actively encouraging the use of POS 11 to reduce healthcare costs and administrative burden. Unless flagged for program integrity issues, providers billing under POS 11 will not have to go through the PA process.

📄 About the WISeR RFA
RFA stands for Request for Applications.
This is the official document issued by CMS that outlines the goals, structure, eligibility, operational details, and compliance requirements for participation in the WISeR Model. The WISeR RFA was released in June 2025, and the model is scheduled to launch on January 1, 2026.

The WISeR RFA makes it clear that site-of-service selection directly triggers the prior authorization requirement. It specifically identifies facility settings (POS 22, POS 24, and POS 19) as requiring PA, while POS 11 (Office) is excluded from that requirement.

📣 Bottom Line:
If your practice performs procedures in POS 22, POS 24, or POS 19, you will need prior authorization starting January 1, 2026, under WISeR.

If you shift those same services to POS 11 (Office), prior authorization will not be required and you’ll reduce friction in reimbursement.

Gold Carding: Rewards for Compliant Providers:
In alignment with other CMS initiatives, WISeR is exploring "gold carding" for providers or suppliers who demonstrate ≥90% PA affirmation rates. This means:

• Less red tape for high-compliance providers
• Reduced audit risk
• More predictable revenue cycle workflows

However, gold card status can be revoked if a provider begins submitting non-compliant claims.

WISeR Model Metrics: What Will CMS Monitor?
To ensure quality, compliance, and beneficiary protection, CMS will monitor WISeR participants and provider outcomes through a robust performance measurement framework. These metrics are divided into three core areas:

🧩 1. Process Quality Metrics
CMS will evaluate how well WISeR participants execute prior authorization reviews. Key indicators include:

• Turnaround time from PA request to determination
• Accuracy and compliance with Medicare coverage rules (NCDs and LCDs)
• Number of affirmations vs. non-affirmations
• Resubmission and reversal rates
• Audit findings on improperly denied services

💡 Insight: Poor-performing vendors risk payment reductions, corrective action plans, or termination from the model.

👩‍⚕️ 2. Provider & Patient Experience
WISeR will evaluate the usability and accessibility of the prior auth process. Surveys will be sent to providers and Medicare beneficiaries, assessing:

• Ease of use (portal, phone, fax)
• Timeliness of decisions
• Clarity of rationale for non-affirmations
• Responsiveness of customer support
• Patient satisfaction and access to care

These feedback scores will affect vendor compensation and CMS’s broader evaluation of model success.

💉 3. Clinical Outcomes
Rather than focus on individual service outcomes, CMS will track downstream indicators, such as:

• Rates of emergency department visits
• Increase in alternative treatments (e.g., surgery, medication)
• Hospitalizations, complications, or readmissions
• Mortality or adverse events

These outcomes will help CMS ensure that denied services weren’t clinically necessary or that patient harm didn’t occur due to access delays.

How the WISeR Model Pays Tech Partners:
Shared Savings for Denied Claims:
A key innovation in WISeR is its payment design: CMS pays tech vendors a percentage of money saved by preventing medically unnecessary claims.

💰 How Does It Work?
If a service is denied (non-affirmed) and never resubmitted successfully or appealed, CMS considers that cost averted. The vendor receives a percentage of that savings—based on:

1. Historical average regional claims data
2. Claim-level total payment (not just the code-line, but all bundled services)
3. Adjusted for the local MAC’s historic denial rate (e.g., 3% baseline denials are subtracted from savings)

This model ensures that vendors are compensated only for added value, not denials CMS would have made anyway.

⚠️ What If the Provider Appeals?
If the provider furnishes the service and successfully appeals the denial:

• The claim is paid.
• The WISeR vendor's payment is clawed back.

This discourages unnecessary denials and incentivizes vendors to focus only on high-certainty fraud, waste, or abuse cases.

📉 What If the Same Service Is Denied Multiple Times?
Vendors are only paid once per denied item per provider per beneficiary per 120-day window. Multiple denials during that time count as a single event.
This limits overbilling by vendors and encourages faster provider education.

CMS Compliance Requirements for WISeR Vendors (and Implications for Providers)CMS will require vendors to meet strict federal compliance standards to protect PHI, streamline operations, and ensure non-discriminatory access.

🛡️ Security & Privacy Regulations:
All model participants must follow:

• HIPAA Security and Privacy Rules
• CMS Acceptable Risk Safeguards (ARS)
• FedRAMP-certified environments
• FISMA standards for IT infrastructure
• CMS Authority to Operate (ATO) guidelines
• Incident reporting within 1 hour of data breach awareness

CMS will execute Business Associate Agreements (BAAs) with each WISeR vendor. These vendors must also establish incident response protocols per CMS Risk Management Handbook (RMH) Chapter 8.

⚖️ Conflict of Interest & Financial Transparency
CMS requires disclosure of:

• All vendor ownership and financial interests
• Any fraud investigations or past sanctions
• Any affiliations with excluded or debarred individuals or entities
• Prohibited vendor behavior: Vendors cannot also sell equipment or services for which they are reviewing prior authorization

Providers should take note: If a tech vendor is also trying to sell products, that vendor is in violation—and your data may be at risk.
​
Strategic Insights for Interventional Pain Management & RCM Firms
As a leading healthcare revenue cycle consultant, here’s our analysis for pain practices and surgical providers:

🔍 1. WISeR Will Target Common Pain Procedures
CPT codes related to:

• Epidural Steroid Injections (ESIs)
• Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation
• Cervical Spinal Fusion
• Nerve Ablation and Stimulator Trials

...are all high-cost, high-utilization services already subject to scrutiny. If you bill for these services in WISeR regions, expect delays, documentation requests, or denials without robust PA processes.

🧠 2. Technology-Driven Denials Require Clinical Precision
Denials will increasingly be made via algorithmic decision logic. This means:

• Outdated templates won’t suffice
• LCD/NCD citation and exact language must be in your documentation
• Objective evidence (imaging, functional limitations) must be pre-submitted

📊 3. Automation Is Your Competitive Advantage.
Practices using EMRs integrated with:

• Real-time LCD/NCD validation
• Prior auth automation tools (e.g., AI bots for checking coverage)
• Smart denial management platforms

...will outperform and avoid cash flow interruptions. Manual billing processes will not survive in WISeR states.

​Preparing for WISeR:
Readiness Checklist for Practices and Revenue Cycle Teams:
If you operate in one of the WISeR target states (NJ, OH, OK, TX, AZ, WA), your practice must prepare now to avoid pre-payment denials, audit flags, and unnecessary revenue delays.

Here’s your WISeR Readiness Checklist:

✅ 1. Identify Impacted Services in Your Practice:
Start by comparing your CPT mix against WISeR’s targeted list.
High-impact categories include:

• Spinal injections
• Neurostimulator implants
• Percutaneous vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty
• ESIs

If these are core to your practice revenue, you are directly exposed.

✅ 2. Audit Your Documentation Against LCD/NCD Requirements.
CMS has stated that WISeR decisions will strictly follow published coverage policies. Your documentation must:

• Include clinical indications listed verbatim in LCDs/NCDs
• Be legible, dated, and signed by the treating provider
• Contain supporting diagnostic test results, not just impressions
• Reflect failed conservative care (e.g., PT, medications, etc.)

📌 Tip: CMS will use national policies first. Where no NCD exists, the regional LCD will apply. Know both.

✅ 3. Map Your Prior Authorization Workflow
You must clarify:

• Who initiates the prior auth? (MAA, biller, nurse?)
• What documentation templates are used?
• Where do you track pending PAs?
• How fast do you respond to a non-affirmation?

Build in checkpoints for peer-to-peer reviews and automated alerts when non-affirmations occur.

✅ 4. Implement Technology for Real-Time Compliance
WISeR is a tech-powered model. You must match its velocity. Consider adopting:

• AI-enabled PA portals that pre-check coverage before submission
• Tools that auto-validate documentation against LCD/NCD language
• Bots that route requests to MACs or WISeR vendors securely
• Dashboards tracking affirmation status and financial risk

💡 If your current billing system is manual, spreadsheets won’t cut it in 2026.

✅ 5. Educate Your Providers & Frontline Staff
If your physician notes lack specificity or contain “copy-paste” templates, you're at high risk for denials.
Provide training on:

• What clinical evidence must be documented
• When to notify patients of possible non-coverage (ABNs)
• How to document failed conservative management clearly
• Language to use in peer-to-peer appeals

Ensure everyone on your team—from scheduler to surgeon—understands the stakes.


Frequently Asked Questions (WISeR FAQs):
Here are answers to the most common questions providers and administrators are asking:

❓ Is WISeR mandatory?
For providers, no. But if you submit a claim for a WISeR-targeted service without prior authorization, your claim may be flagged for prepayment review, delaying payment.
For technology vendors, yes, once selected by CMS, they are bound by participation agreements.

❓ Will WISeR change what Medicare covers?
No. WISeR does not change Medicare coverage rules. It only enforces those rules upfront via prior authorization, rather than after the fact via audits.

❓ How do I know if my claim was selected for WISeR review?
If your claim includes a WISeR-targeted CPT code and you did not submit a prior auth, the MAC may place it on hold and route it to the WISeR vendor for review.

❓ Can I appeal a non-affirmation?Yes. You can:

• Resubmit with corrected documentation
• Request a peer-to-peer review
• Furnish the service and appeal the claim denial under standard Medicare rules

❓ What happens to practices with high affirmation rates?
CMS may “gold card” compliant providers, exempting them from future prior auth reviews for certain services. To qualify, your provisional affirmation rate must remain at or above 90%.

Final Thoughts:
Why WISeR Isn’t Optional. It’s the Future
The WISeR Model is more than another pilot program. It’s CMS’s first full-scale effort to bring AI-driven utilization management from Medicare Advantage into Original Medicare. It will define the future of:

• Prior authorization
• Payer-provider dynamics
• Value-based payment models
• Compliance and documentation in outpatient care

🚨 If You’re Not Ready for WISeR, You Risk:

• Delayed claims and cash flow issues
• Higher denial rates and audit exposure
• Loss of patient trust due to service cancellations
• Missing out on gold carding or fast-track reimbursements

But if you prepare now, you can:
✅ Build an agile, compliant, tech-empowered practice
✅ Educate your providers and front desk to ensure smoother workflows
✅ Lead your region in quality metrics and CMS trust

Take Action Now: WISeR Readiness Services for Your Practice
GoHealthcare Practice Solutions, LLC offers:

• WISeR Readiness Audits (LCD/NCD + documentation alignment)
• PA Workflow Automation Tools (AI-powered)
• Billing Compliance Training for Providers
• MAC-specific Strategy for JH, JL, JF, J15

📣 CMS Is Watching — Are You Ready?
The future of prior authorization is here and it's intelligent, integrated, and increasingly automated. Whether you're a surgical center, pain clinic, or orthopedic practice, your ability to comply with CMS's WISeR Model will directly impact your financial performance, audit risk, and long-term sustainability in Medicare.

• ❗Don't get caught unprepared. The smartest providers are not waiting, they’re proactively redesigning workflows, auditing site-of-service utilization, and implementing intelligent automation solutions to stay ahead.
  At GoHealthcare Practice Solutions, we specialize in guiding practices through CMS compliance, revenue integrity, and operational transformation.
• Our Prior Authorization rate is at 98% Approval Rate and fastest turn-around time!

 ​📩 Schedule Your WISeR Readiness Consultation now

• Or call us directly at (800) 267-8752 to speak with our expert team.
  Let’s prepare your practice to thrive—not just survive—in this new era of value-driven, site-sensitive care delivery.

Deep Dive:
WISeR Compliance, Appeals & Documentation Strategy for Healthcare Organizations
As CMS shifts from retrospective to proactive enforcement through the WISeR model, the expectations around documentation, appeals, and audit readiness become significantly more demanding. Let’s explore what that means in operational terms—and how your practice can respond now to protect both revenue and reputation.

🔎 Understanding CMS’s Coverage Enforcement Hierarchy
WISeR relies on existing Medicare policies, but enforces them through a layered and increasingly intelligent process.
Here’s how it works:
Policy BasisDescriptionStatutory/Regulatory Criteria
Set by federal law (e.g., Social Security Act §1862[a][1][A])
NCD (National Coverage Determination)
CMS’s national policy on specific services, must be followed by all MACs
LCD (Local Coverage Determination)MAC-specific coverage criteria—may differ across regions
Subregulatory Guidance
CMS manuals, transmittals, and FAQs—often cited in audits
Clinical Literature
May be used to support coverage or appeal decisions, but not a substitute for official guidance
✅ Takeaway: Your documentation must align with the most authoritative applicable policy. LCDs may override general practice norms in your region.

🧾 The Anatomy of a WISeR-Ready Prior Authorization Package:
To avoid denials, your PA submission must include:

1. Clear Diagnosis Codes (ICD-10-CM): Matching the clinical indications listed in the NCD/LCD.
2. Detailed Clinical Notes: Showing patient history, conservative care attempts, and rationale for service.
3. Imaging & Test Results: Attach scans, labs, EMG reports, or other supporting evidence.
4. Procedure Plan: Include technique, CPT/HCPCS codes, and setting of care.
5. Provider Signature & Date: Each note must be authenticated.

🛡 Pro Tip: Many providers lose appeals not because the care wasn’t necessary—but because the documentation didn’t “tell the story” clearly and in policy language.

🗂 CMS Audit Triggers Under WISeR
CMS will audit both WISeR tech vendors and Medicare providers. Here are top triggers to watch for:

• ❗ High rates of non-affirmed claims followed by actual delivery of services
• ❗ Mismatches between PA determination and billing documentation
• ❗ Failure to submit documentation upon MAC or vendor request
• ❗ Use of outdated or incorrect CPT/ICD codes
• ❗ Repeated appeals overturned—indicating improper initial denial (vendor side) or aggressive appeal behavior (provider side)

🔒 Note: CMS may request 1 year of documentation history for reviewed services and will claw back payments if systemic patterns are found.

📝 When the PA Is Denied: Appeal and Peer-to-Peer Options
CMS allows unlimited resubmissions following a non-affirmation but each must include additional or corrected information. Here’s your appeal playbook:
Step 1: Analyze the Denial

• What criteria was not met?
• Was it a documentation issue or clinical mismatch?
• Is the LCD cited regionally correct?

Step 2: Request Peer-to-Peer Review

• Your provider speaks directly with a WISeR clinician
• Clarify evidence, discuss clinical appropriateness
• May help reverse a non-affirmed decision before resubmitting

Step 3: Resubmit the PA

• Include peer-to-peer summary
• Highlight corrections or new documentation
• Label it as “2nd Review” to ensure tracking

Step 4: If Denied Again. Submit the Claim Anyway

• If service is performed, submit to Medicare
• This triggers a formal initial determination
• Appeal rights begin under 42 CFR Part 405 Subpart I

💬 Important: CMS encourages peer-to-peer outreach and educational tone over adversarial behavior. Providers who overuse appeals may trigger scrutiny.

WISeR and AI: How CMS is Shaping the Next Phase of Digital Health Oversight
The WISeR model represents more than just a payment shift, it’s a paradigm shift in how Medicare regulates through technology.

🧠 Enhanced Tech Requirements for WISeR Vendors
Each WISeR vendor must operate within CMS’s strict security and IT governance environment, including:
Requirement Explanation
FedRAMP Certification:
Vendor cloud systems must meet federal security baselines
FISMA Compliance:
All systems must comply with Federal Information Security Management Act
CMS IS2P2 and ARS Alignment:
CMS’s internal security and privacy frameworks
HIPAA BAA Execution:
Business Associate Agreements are mandatory for PHI sharing
Incident Response in 1 Hour
Security breaches must be reported within 60 minutes

✅ Why it matters:
Any practice partnering with a vendor; directly or indirectly must ensure no data exchange violates these standards. Even a faxed document may count as PHI transfer.

🤖 Automation in PA: What Providers Must Embrace
Practices should adopt technologies that mirror WISeR vendor capabilities.
That includes:

• Automated PA Precheck Engines: Flag cases that lack required LCD/NCD indicators
• Smart Document Templates: Prompt providers to chart exact LCD coverage language
• AI Denial Prediction Tools: Analyze claim history to forecast WISeR risk exposure
• Integrated PA Dashboards: Track affirmation rates, timelines, and appeal status

💡 Bonus Insight: These tools will not only help in WISeR states but will be essential if the model expands nationwide, which CMS is strongly considering post-2031.

WISeR Glossary for Healthcare Executives & Compliance Teams. To navigate the WISeR model with precision, your team must understand the terminology CMS uses across policy, compliance, and technology standards. Below is a glossary to support your documentation, training, and audit defense.

📚 WISeR Executive Glossary
Term Definition
WISeR
Wasteful and Inappropriate Services Reduction Model—a CMS initiative to curb fraud, waste, and abuse via tech-enhanced prior authorization.
PA (Prior Authorization)
A provisional coverage review performed before a claim is submitted, ensuring services meet Medicare criteria.
NCD (National Coverage Determination)
Federally binding CMS policies that define coverage criteria for specific services nationwide.
LCD (Local Coverage Determination)
Region-specific rules set by Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) that determine whether a service is considered medically necessary.
MAC (Medicare Administrative Contractor)
The regional authority responsible for processing claims, conducting audits, and enforcing CMS billing policies.
Affirmation
A decision from CMS or WISeR vendor that a service meets coverage criteria and will likely be paid if billed correctly.
Non-Affirmation
A denial decision indicating that the submitted documentation does not meet CMS coverage requirements.
Peer-to-Peer Review
A dialogue between the provider and the reviewing clinician to resolve or contest a prior auth decision.
FedRAMP
Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program - a government-wide program for cloud security assessment and authorization.
FISMA
Federal Information Security Management Act - a federal law that requires secure management of sensitive government data.
ARS & IS2P2
Acceptable Risk Safeguards (ARS) and Information Security & Privacy Policy (IS2P2)—CMS’s internal security protocols.
Gold Carding
Exemption from PA requirements for providers with ≥90% affirmation rates in a given review period.
ABN (Advance Beneficiary Notice)
A written notice to a patient when a service is likely to be denied and they may be personally responsible for payment.
Claim Clawback
A payment recovery initiated by CMS when a previously affirmed or paid service is later determined to be non-compliant.

📄 Official CMS WISeR RFA & Model Resources

• CMS Innovation Center – WISeR Model (RFA PDF)
  https://www.cms.gov/files/document/wiser-model-rfa.pdf .This is the official Request for Applications outlining model goals, site-of-service PA requirements, eligible services, geographic areas, and timelines for the WISeR Model Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services+10Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services+10PYA+10.
• CMS WISeR Model Webpage (Overview & FAQs)
  https://www.cms.gov/priorities/innovation/innovation-models/wiser . Includes access to the RFA, fact sheets, FAQs, office hours, and application portal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ServicesCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services+5Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services+5Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services+5.

⚖️ Statutory & Regulatory References

• Statutory Authority: Section 1115A of the Social Security Act
  • Establishes the CMS Innovation Center’s authority to test payment and service delivery models like WISeR.
• Medicare Prior Authorization Appeals: 42 CFR § 405 Subpart I
  • Governs the administrative appeals process for prior authorization decisions in Medicare fee-for-service. See federal regulations for details.
• HIPAA Privacy Rule (Business Associate Agreements): 45 CFR §§ 164.502(e), 164.504(e)
  • Addresses data sharing/privacy requirements and business associate duties under WISeR.
• CMS Audit Policy – Risk Management Handbook, Chapter 8 (Incident Response)
  • Describes CMS’s policy on audits, monitoring, and incident response relevant to WISeR model compliance.
• Prior Authorization Policy Basis – 42 CFR § 410.20(d)
  • Provides the legal basis for Medicare requiring prior authorization for certain outpatient services.
• Interoperability & Prior Authorization Rule – 89 FR 8758 (CMS‑0057‑F)
  • Federal Register final rule establishing data exchange standards and electronic prior authorization requirements.

🧭 Summary of Effective Dates & Compliance
All WISeR-related prior authorization functions—including those for POS 22, 24, and 19 become mandatory starting January 1, 2026, in applicable regions and for covered services. These requirements come directly from the CMS WISeR Model Request for Applications, based on the authority laid out in Section 1115A, and aligned with CMS’s regulatory authority over PA, audits, and privacy.
​
GoHealthcare Practice Solutions, LLC is already helping practices across New Jersey, Ohio, Texas, Arizona, Oklahoma, and Washington navigate the WISeR rollout with ease.

🚀 WISeR Readiness Includes:
✅ Full audit of your current CPTs vs. WISeR targets
✅ LCD/NCD-based documentation templates for high-risk services
✅ AI-enhanced PA submission workflows
✅ Provider coaching + appeal strategy guides
✅ MAC-specific implementation for JH, JL, JF, and J15

📞 Ready to future-proof your revenue?
Text or call (800) 267-8752 to speak directly with our team, or schedule your strategy call today.

📩 Schedule a Free WISeR Readiness Consultation
Final Word: This Is More Than a Model. It’s the New Normal.
WISeR is not just about reducing waste—it’s about redefining the standard of proof for medical necessity. As the line between care delivery and payer enforcement blurs, your ability to operate with transparency, precision, and automation becomes your biggest competitive edge.
Don't wait for a denial to discover what WISeR means. Get ready now and lead the next generation of healthcare compliance.

About the Author
This article was authored by Pinky Maniri-Pescasio, MSc, BSc, CRCR, CSPPM, CSBI, CSPR, CSAF, and Certified in Healthcare AI Governance. With over 28 years of experience in healthcare financial operations, Medicare compliance, and AI-powered revenue cycle strategy, Pinky is a nationally recognized expert in interventional pain management and orthopedic practice transformation.

As a respected National Speaker on revenue cycle management, payer policy, and CMS regulatory reform, Pinky has presented for leading medical organizations including PAINWeek and the Obesity Medicine Association. She is known for translating complex policy into actionable strategies that help practices improve compliance, accelerate reimbursement, and reduce administrative burden.
Pinky’s expertise in utilization management, clinical guidelines, and medical necessity documentation has contributed to her team's 98% prior authorization approval rate. At GoHealthcare Practice Solutions, she leads a team committed to helping providers thrive under changing CMS rules  including the upcoming WISeR Model.
​
📩 Schedule your WISeR readiness consultation now at www.gohealthcarellc.com
📞 Or call us at 800-267-8752

1. ❓ What is the CMS WISeR Model?
Answer:
WISeR stands for Weighting-Indicated Site-of-Service Reform, a CMS innovation model launching in January 2026. It ties prior authorization (PA) requirements to the site of service (POS) where procedures are performed.

2. ❓ When does the WISeR Model go into effect?
Answer:
January 1, 2026. All practices billing Medicare for targeted procedures in select settings must be compliant by that date.

3. ❓ What is the goal of the WISeR Model?
Answer:
CMS aims to reduce costs and increase transparency by encouraging services in lower-cost settings (like the physician’s office) and applying utilization controls like prior authorization in higher-cost settings.

4. ❓ Which POS codes require prior authorization under WISeR?
Answer:

• POS 22: On-Campus Outpatient Hospital
• POS 24: Ambulatory Surgical Center (ASC)
• POS 19: Off-Campus Outpatient Hospital

All require prior authorization under WISeR.

5. ❓ Which POS code does not require prior authorization?
Answer:
POS 11 – Office. In most cases, procedures billed under POS 11 will not require prior authorization under WISeR.

6. ❓ What types of procedures are impacted?
Answer:
WISeR targets interventional pain management procedures, orthopedic injections, and other outpatient procedures commonly billed in ASC or hospital settings. A full CPT list is provided in the CMS WISeR RFA.

7. ❓ Who is required to comply with WISeR?
Answer:
Medicare-enrolled providers in targeted geographic regions who perform WISeR-covered procedures in facility settings (POS 19, 22, 24).

8. ❓ How will WISeR impact interventional pain practices?
Answer:
Practices performing procedures in hospitals or ASCs will need to build robust prior auth workflows, improve documentation, and possibly shift services to office-based settings to avoid delays.

9. ❓ How does this affect orthopedic specialists?
Answer:
Orthopedic practices that provide injections or minor procedures in ASCs or outpatient hospitals will also face new prior authorization requirements under WISeR.

10. ❓ What is the risk of non-compliance?
Answer:
Practices that fail to comply risk prior auth denials, reimbursement delays, increased audits, and potential revenue loss.

11. ❓ Will reimbursement rates change under WISeR?
Answer:
WISeR is primarily focused on site-of-service policy and utilization, not direct payment changes. However, POS selection may influence payment weighting and audit frequency.

12. ❓ Does WISeR affect commercial insurance?
Answer:
WISeR is a Medicare-specific model, but commercial payers often follow CMS policy trends. It’s likely that similar site-based PA models will expand to commercial plans.

13. ❓ How can I check if I’m in a WISeR-targeted region?
Answer:
CMS provides a regional list in the WISeR RFA. Practices should also monitor MAC (Medicare Administrative Contractor) updates and CMS.gov for participation maps.

14. ❓ What documentation is required under WISeR?
Answer:
You must provide strong evidence of medical necessity, aligned with clinical guidelines, and include prior treatments, failed conservative care, imaging, and decision rationale.

15. ❓ Who should manage WISeR readiness in my practice?
Answer:
Billing managers, compliance officers, or RCM consultants should lead. GoHealthcare Practice Solutions can also manage full workflow design, staff training, and payer alignment for you.

16. ❓ What kind of workflow changes are needed?
Answer:
You’ll need a clear process for:

• Pre-service eligibility
• Documentation prep
• PA submission
• Payer follow-up
• Appeals (if needed)

We help clients build this from the ground up.

17. ❓ Can we automate any part of the prior authorization process?
Answer:
Yes. GoHealthcare Practice Solutions leverages AI-driven platforms and EMR-integrated tools to automate portions of prior auth and documentation review without sacrificing compliance.

18. ❓ What’s a good WISeR preparation timeline?
Answer:
Start now (mid-2025) to:

• Audit POS usage
• Map out affected procedures
• Train your team
• Adjust scheduling protocols
• Test prior auth workflows

19. ❓ What’s your team’s success rate with prior authorization?
Answer:
We maintain a 98% prior authorization approval rate by aligning clinical documentation, coding, and payer-specific protocols especially in pain management and orthopedics.

20. ❓ How can GoHealthcare help us get ready?
Answer:
We provide:

• WISeR workflow audits
• Staff training
• Medical necessity documentation templates
• Full prior auth playbooks
• EMR workflow design
• Ongoing compliance support

📞 Call us at 800-267-8752
📩 Or schedule a consultation at www.gohealthcarellc.com
​

How should I handle denied claims for interventional pain management and orthopedic procedures?

Answer:
When a claim is denied:

1. Review the denial code and reason provided by the payer.
2. Check documentation to confirm compliance with payer guidelines.
3. File an appeal if the denial was incorrect, including supporting records.
4. Resubmit corrected claims with necessary modifiers or medical necessity details.
5. Contact the payer if needed for clarification or reconsideration.

A strong denial management process can recover lost revenue and improve claim approvals.

How does prior authorization impact reimbursement for Pain Management and Orthopedic services?
Answer:
Prior authorization is a major hurdle for reimbursement. Without it, payers may:

• Deny claims outright even if the procedure is medically necessary.
• Delay payments, causing cash flow issues.
• Require extensive appeals and documentation, increasing administrative burden.

To streamline prior authorizations:

• Verify payer requirements early and obtain approvals before scheduling procedures.
• Use automated authorization tracking tools for follow-ups.
• Maintain detailed clinical documentation to justify medical necessity.

A proactive prior authorization strategy can significantly reduce denials.

In the high-volume, high-complexity world of orthopedic medicine, medical billing is not just a back-office function—it's a strategic priority. Between bundled procedures, surgical coding intricacies, and ever-evolving payer rules, orthopedic practices face some of the toughest reimbursement challenges in healthcare. Denials, delays, and underpayments are far too common.

To stay profitable and compliant in 2025, orthopedic practices must shift from reactive billing to proactive, precision-driven revenue cycle management (RCM). This article breaks down the most pressing challenges in orthopedic billing and outlines practical, AI-enhanced solutions to help you get paid faster, cleaner, and with fewer denials.

The Unique Billing Challenges of Orthopedic Practices
Orthopedics stands apart due to its:

• High surgical volume with complex procedure bundling (e.g., total joint replacements)
• Frequent use of multiple procedure modifiers (e.g., -59, -25, -51)
• High incidence of pre-authorizations for MRIs, injections, DME, and surgeries
• Rapid payer policy changes regarding musculoskeletal conditions
• Risk of under-coding or over-coding due to overlapping documentation

Even the most experienced billers can struggle with coding scenarios like:

• Scenario 1: Arthroscopic shoulder surgery (CPT 29823) performed bilaterally—modifier -50 or use RT/LT with two line items?
• Scenario 2: Same-day visit (99213-25) followed by a joint injection (20610) on the same knee—was modifier -25 appropriate?
• Scenario 3: Open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for a distal radius fracture (CPT 25607), but the claim was denied for bundling—was another code submitted?

Most Common Denial Reasons in Orthopedic Billing 🚫

1. Missing or incorrect modifiers
2. Lack of medical necessity documentation
3. Expired or incorrect prior authorizations
4. Incorrect use of global periods
5. Failure to distinguish between staged vs. related procedures

These issues often stem from rushed documentation, manual verification errors, or outdated workflows. Each denied claim can cost an orthopedic practice $25 to $100 or more to rework—if it gets reworked at all.

Proven Strategies to Improve Orthopedic Reimbursement:

1. Modifier Mastery
​🧩Ensure your coding team understands the precise usage of modifiers:

• -59: Distinct procedural service (not always interchangeable with -51)
• -25: Separate E/M service on the same day as a procedure
• -51: Multiple procedures performed at the same session
• RT/LT and bilateral modifiers for side-specific procedures

2. Pre-Authorization Workflow Optimization
🗂️Use checklists and payer-specific matrices to verify:

• Diagnosis code requirements
• Imaging prerequisites (e.g., 6-week conservative treatment)
• Authorization time limits (often 30-90 days)

3. Surgical Bundling Education
🧠Educate surgeons and schedulers on what’s included in the global surgical package:

• Follow-up visits
• Minor dressing changes
• Routine post-op care

Bill separately only when documentation supports medical necessity.
4. Documentation Coaching for Providers
✍️Train providers to document with billing in mind:

• Specific joint/location
• Duration of symptoms
• Conservative therapies attempted
• Laterality, severity, and progression

Where AI and Automation Make the Difference
🤖GoHealthcare Practice Solutions' AI Division has implemented powerful tools that solve orthopedic billing pain points:

• Auto-verification bots: Instantly check payer eligibility and pre-auth requirements
• AI-powered documentation review: Flag missing elements that impact medical necessity
• Predictive denial prevention: Alert billing teams to high-risk claims before submission
• Real-time modifier validation: Suggest correct modifiers using historical and policy-based logic

By integrating AI into your RCM workflow, you can reduce orthopedic billing denials by up to 35%, improve clean claim rates, and drastically cut days in A/R.
​
Compliance and Audit Readiness:
🔍Orthopedic practices are increasingly targeted for audits, especially on:

• Modifier -25 misuse
• Epidural and spinal injection series
• DME billing (e.g., braces, boots, slings)
• Same-day multiple surgical procedures

Ensure documentation and coding align with:

• CMS NCCI Edits
• Local Coverage Determinations (LCDs)
• Commercial payer bulletins

AI tools from GoHealthcare can help pre-check compliance issues before they go out the door.

Measuring Success: Key Metrics to Track 📊

• Denial Rate (Ortho-specific)
• Pre-Auth Approval Rate
• Clean Claim Rate
• Average Reimbursement Per CPT Code
• Days in A/R (surgical vs. office-based)
• Modifier Accuracy Rate

Partner with Experts in Orthopedic RCM
🤝At GoHealthcare Practice Solutions, we specialize in full-cycle RCM for orthopedic practices. Our team understands the intricacies of procedure coding, documentation gaps, and payer rule changes. We not only manage your billing—we enhance your revenue.

With decades of combined experience and a dedicated AI division, we offer:

• Workflow audits and optimization
• Orthopedic-specific denial analysis
• Automation for pre-auth and eligibility
• Coding and compliance education

Final Thoughts:
​💭Orthopedic billing doesn’t have to be a source of revenue loss or regulatory anxiety. With proactive workflows, smart automation, and deep coding expertise, your practice can thrive even in a tightening payer environment.

Don’t let errors or inefficiencies hold your revenue hostage. Partner with a team that understands both the surgical suite and the revenue cycle.

About the Author:

Pinky Maniri Pescasio is the CEO and Founder of GoHealthcare Practice Solutions, LLC, a leading healthcare consulting and RCM company known for empowering specialty practices through advanced billing strategies and AI-powered solutions. With over 28 years of experience, Pinky is a trusted advisor to orthopedic groups nationwide, helping them improve compliance, maximize reimbursement, and future-proof their revenue cycle.

What modifiers are essential for billing Pain Management and Orthopedic procedures?
​
​Answer:
Modifiers help indicate special circumstances in billing. Some crucial ones include:

• 25 – Significant, separately identifiable E/M service on the same day as a procedure
• 50 – Bilateral procedure
• 59 – Distinct procedural service (used when procedures should not be bundled)
• XU – Unusual, non-overlapping service
• RT/LT – Right or left body part identifier
• GA – Waiver of liability statement (ABN required)
• GY – Service not covered by Medicare

Correct use of modifiers prevents denials and ensures proper reimbursement.

The Power of RCM in Today’s Healthcare Practices.
As the CEO & Founder of GoHealthcare Practice Solutions, LLC, I’ve seen firsthand how Revenue Cycle Management (RCM) can make or break a medical practice. In today’s complex, fast-paced healthcare landscape, mastering RCM is no longer optional, it’s essential. With shrinking margins, increasing regulations, and patient financial responsibility at an all-time high, healthcare providers must adopt robust systems that optimize both front-end and back-end revenue processes.

One of the most powerful tools we deploy for our clients is athenahealth RCM, particularly athenaOne billing. Over the last five years, our expert team has partnered with practices to leverage athenahealth’s capabilities, streamline their revenue operations, and deliver measurable improvements in cash flow, claim resolution, and denial rates.

In this article, I’ll walk you through the secrets behind top-performing medical practices using athenahealth and how GoHealthcare Practice Solutions helps them stay ahead.

The Challenges of Revenue Cycle Management in 2025
Today’s practices face a host of challenges:

• Evolving payer rules and fee schedules
• Complex pre-authorization processes
• High patient deductibles and co-insurance
• Delayed reimbursements from both payers and patients
• Workforce shortages and training gaps

RCM isn’t just about sending out claims, it’s about managing the entire financial journey, from scheduling and verification to payment posting and appeals. Poorly managed RCM can lead to increased days in A/R, ballooning denials, and ultimately, lost revenue.

Why Top Practices Choose athenahealth
athenahealth is a cloud-based powerhouse that offers integrated solutions across clinical, financial, and operational workflows. Practices choose athenaOne billing because of its:

• Seamless claim scrubbing and submission
• Built-in payer rule updates
• Real-time insurance eligibility verification
• Integrated denial tracking
• User-friendly dashboards for KPI monitoring

At GoHealthcare Practice Solutions, we specialize in navigating and optimizing these tools. Our team has over 8 years of deep, hands-on experience with athenahealth (now athenaOne) across multiple specialties and practice sizes.

Secrets of High-Performing Practices Using athenahealth
High-performing practices that use athenahealth have a few things in common:

1. They Don’t Just Implement—They Optimize
These practices don’t treat athenahealth as plug-and-play. They customize it to align with their workflows, configure rules for claim edits, and set up tracking mechanisms for key metrics.
2. They Audit Constantly
Ongoing audits of claims, payments, and rejections help prevent revenue leakage. Automation makes it easier, but human oversight ensures nothing slips through the cracks.
3. They Train Staff Thoroughly
Top-performing teams know how to use athenahealth effectively. From front-desk staff to billing teams, everyone is trained and accountable.
4. They Use Partner Expertise
Working with a partner like GoHealthcare gives practices access to an RCM extension of their team—experts who live and breathe athenaOne billing daily.

Automation & AI in RCM
Automation and AI are transforming RCM. Within athenahealth, we implement features such as:

• Automated eligibility checks
• Intelligent claim edits based on payer behavior
• Denial prediction models
• Chatbots for patient balance reminders

These capabilities free up staff to focus on patient care and complex revenue issues, driving efficiency and reducing errors.

Patient Responsibility Management
With high-deductible plans on the rise, patient payments now represent nearly 35% of practice revenue.
Our team uses athenahealth to:

• Verify patient eligibility in real-time
• Generate accurate estimates before the visit
• Offer payment plans within the portal
• Send automated reminders via email or text

We help practices build trust while collecting more upfront.

Front-end Accuracy & Pre-authorization Processes
Revenue success starts before the visit.

Our strategy includes:

• Insurance verification 48 hours prior to appointments
• Authorization tracking logs built in athenahealth
• Training front-desk staff to collect required documentation
• Scripted communication templates for pre-service collections

By ensuring accuracy up front, we significantly reduce denials and delays downstream.

Denial Management & Reduction Tactics
Denials are a top cause of revenue loss. With athenaOne, we:

• Set up custom denial categories for precise reporting
• Route rejections to designated billing teams in real-time
• Track top 5 denial reasons by payer
• Set 48-hour turnaround goals for appeal submissions

Our team reduces initial denial rates to below 5%, with resolution rates above 90%.

Dashboards, KPIs, and Benchmarking Success
athenahealth provides dashboards that help us monitor key performance indicators (KPIs) such as:

• Clean claim rate
• First-pass resolution rate (FPRR)
• Average days in A/R
• Net collection rate
• Patient collections rate

Using these tools, we benchmark performance monthly and hold teams accountable with data-driven goals.

Our Expert Billing and Coding Strategies at GoHealthcare Practice Solutions
GoHealthcare Practice Solutions isn’t just another practice management company. Our process includes:

• Full athenaOne optimization audits
• A/R takeovers for aging claims
• Denial trends analytics with root cause corrections
• Weekly performance reviews
• Custom SOPs tailored to each client’s workflow

We act as an extension of your team, dedicated to improving collections, reducing denials, and driving operational efficiency.

Real Client Results:
Here are some recent results from our clients using athenahealth:

• Orthopedic practice in NJ: Reduced A/R over 90 days from 32% to 12% within 6 months.
• Multi-specialty clinic in TX: Increased patient collections by 22% through portal-based payment reminders.
• Cardiology group in CA: Achieved 98% FPRR by optimizing front-end claim edits.

These outcomes are achieved through consistent collaboration, system optimization, and expert oversight.

How We Reduce Denials and Days in A/R
Our formula:

• Root cause analysis of top denial reasons
• Daily rejection reviews in athenaOne
• Weekly appeal tracking meetings
• Real-time claim status updates
• Regular payer-specific training for staff

The result? Denials drop. A/R days shrink. Collections go up.

Staff Training and RCM Workflow Redesign
We believe people + process = performance. That’s why we:

• Train front-desk, billers, and coders on athena workflows
• Re-map processes to reduce manual entry
• Standardize documentation to minimize claim errors
• Align team KPIs with financial goals

When every stakeholder is aligned, the system performs better.

Top 10 RCM KPIs with Target Benchmarks

1. KPI Target Benchmark
2. Clean Claim Rate≥95%
3. First Pass Resolution Rate (FPRR)≥90%
4. Average Days in A/R< 35 days
5. Denial Rate< 5%
6. Net Collection Rate≥95%
7. Patient Collection Rate≥80%
8. No Response Rate< 10%
9. Days to Pay< 21 days
10. % of A/R > 90 Days< 10%

Authorization Compliance Rate100%
We help practices track and hit these benchmarks using athenahealth’s built-in tools.
athenaOne Optimization Tips from RCM Experts.

Here are some insider tips from our experts:

1. Use custom rules for charge edits to match payer nuances.
2. Automate recurring charges for predictable services.
3. Enable real-time eligibility alerts in scheduler view.
4. Use the task bucket system to streamline denial workflows.
5. Tag charges with custom attributes for performance tracking.
6. Review clearinghouse rejections daily and adjust scrubbing rules accordingly.
7. Optimize patient statements for clarity and response rates

With the right setup, athenaOne becomes your most powerful financial tool.
Achieving Financial Health in Medical Practices

RCM mastery isn’t a dream, it’s a decision.
At GoHealthcare Practice Solutions, we empower practices to unlock the full potential of athenahealth RCM through expert guidance, customized strategies, and relentless execution. We’ve helped clients across the country turn financial chaos into clarity.

If your practice is ready to elevate performance, reduce denials, and get paid faster, let’s talk.
Schedule a free consultation or revenue cycle audit today.

Let our team of athenaOne billing experts show you what’s possible.

Disclaimer: We are not contracted by, affiliated with, or endorsed by AthenaHealth in any capacity. We do not receive compensation, sponsorship, or any form of payment from AthenaHealth. All references to AthenaHealth are made for informational purposes only and do not imply any official connection.

How can I ensure my practice’s coding is accurate and compliant with Medicare and commercial payers?

Answer:
To maintain compliance and accuracy:

• Stay updated on Medicare Local Coverage Determinations (LCDs) and National Coverage Determinations (NCDs).
• Use ICD-10 diagnosis codes that support medical necessity based on payer policies.
• Apply correct CPT codes with appropriate modifiers.
• Train staff regularly on payer policy updates and coding guidelines.
• Conduct internal audits to identify coding errors before claim submission.
• Ensure detailed and complete provider documentation supports billed procedures.

Working with experienced medical billers and coders can help prevent errors and compliance risks.

Claim denials are one of the most frustrating and costly obstacles in the revenue cycle of any healthcare practice. Whether you're managing a small medical office or overseeing billing operations for a large group practice, denied claims can lead to cash flow delays, staff burnout, and lost revenue. In 2025, as payers tighten policy enforcement and increase use of automated claim reviews, it’s more important than ever to adopt a disciplined, strategic, and proactive approach to denial resolution. This article walks you through a practical, step-by-step framework to understand, respond to, and reduce claim denials effectively.

Step 1: Understand the Types of Claim Denials
There are two primary types of claim denials:
1. Hard Denials: Permanent rejections that cannot be resubmitted. Examples include billing for non-covered services or missing filing deadlines.
2. Soft Denials: Temporary denials that can be corrected and resubmitted. These often involve coding errors, missing documentation, or lack of prior authorization.

Step 2: Identify the Root Cause
Before you take action, you must know why the claim was denied. Denial reason codes (CARC and RARC codes) explain the payer’s rationale. Common causes include:
- Incorrect patient demographics
- Invalid or missing modifiers
- CPT/ICD-10 mismatch
- Lack of medical necessity
- Missing prior authorization
- Non-covered services per policy

Step 3: Gather Your Documentation
To overturn a denial, your appeal must include:
- A clear explanation letter (appeal letter)
- A copy of the original claim
- Clinical documentation supporting medical necessity
- Authorization reference numbers if applicable
- Relevant medical policy or payer coverage criteria

Step 4: Write a Compelling Appeal
Your appeal letter should include the following:
• Patient name, DOB, date of service, and claim number
• Summary of the denial reason
• Clinical explanation of why the service was necessary
• Documentation highlights
• A clear request for reconsideration based on payer policy

Use clear and professional language. If possible, quote from the payer's own policy to strengthen your case.

Step 5: Track and Follow Up
Each payer has a different appeals window — some allow 30 days, others 90. Submit the appeal within the timeframe and track the status every week. Use a denial tracker to log:
- Date of denial
- Date appeal submitted
- Documents sent
- Contact names
- Outcome

Step 6: Implement Preventive Measures
Once you’ve addressed a denial, prevent it from recurring. Root cause analysis helps improve:
- Provider documentation training
- Coding and modifier use
- Pre-authorization workflows
- Eligibility verification and intake accuracy
- Payer-specific claim rules in your practice management system

Real-Life Case Example
A pain management practice submitted a claim for a lumbar RFA (CPT 64635). It was denied due to 'lack of medical necessity.' The denial team reviewed the documentation and found that the provider failed to list the prior diagnostic medial branch block results in the procedure note. They gathered the block results from a previous encounter, wrote an appeal citing the Medicare LCD policy that requires ≥50% relief after two blocks, and resubmitted the claim. The payer reversed the denial and paid the full amount.

Industry Denial Statistics in 2025:
Average denial rate for physician practices: 10–15%
- Top denial reasons: Prior authorization, coding errors, eligibility, non-covered services
- 80% of denied claims are recoverable — if appealed timely and accurately
- Practices lose 3–5% of total revenue annually due to preventable denials

References and Additional Reading:
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) – Medicare Claims Processing Manual
• American Medical Association – CPT® 2025 Professional Edition
• Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) – Benchmarking Reports
• Healthcare Financial Management Association (HFMA) – Revenue Cycle Best Practices
• AAPC Knowledge Center – Appeals and Denials Management

​

Why do insurance companies frequently deny pain management and orthopedic claims?

Answer:
Common reasons for denials include:

• Lack of medical necessity: Payers require thorough documentation proving the necessity of procedures.
• Incorrect or missing modifiers: Some orthopedic and pain management procedures require modifiers like 50, 59, or X-series modifiers for correct billing.
• Failure to obtain prior authorization: Many interventional procedures (e.g., spinal cord stimulators, radiofrequency ablation) require prior approval.
• Global period issues: If a procedure is performed within the global period of another surgery, it may be denied unless correctly coded.
• Bundling and NCCI edits: Certain procedures are considered inclusive of others and cannot be separately reimbursed unless exceptions apply.

Avoiding denials requires understanding payer policies, coding correctly, and submitting complete documentation.

🔍 What Is Pain Management Billing and Coding?
Pain management involves diagnosing and treating chronic pain using interventional procedures like injections, ablations, and implants.
✔️ Your job as a biller or coder:

• Translate what the provider did into CPT codes
• Match that service with the correct diagnosis (ICD-10)
• Add modifiers and place of service codes
• Ensure documentation supports medical necessity
• Submit claims to insurance (correctly) the first time

✍️ Understanding CPT Codes in Pain Management
Let’s break down real CPT codes line-by-line. These are not just numbers — they are full sentences describing what was done.

📌 A. Facet Joint Injections (Cervical, Thoracic, Lumbar)
CPT 64490
Injection, paravertebral facet joint (cervical/thoracic), single level, with image guidance
➤ Use for the first level treated in the neck or upper back
➤ Add 64491 for the second level
➤ Add 64492 for the third level (only bill once per session)
What to document:

• Level injected (e.g., C4-C5)
• Side treated (right/left/bilateral)
• Type of medication injected
• Image guidance used (fluoro or CT)
• Diagnosis (e.g., M54.2 — cervicalgia or M54.12 — cervical radiculopathy)

📌 B. Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA)
CPT 64635
Destruction by neurolytic agent, lumbar/sacral facet joint nerve(s), with image guidance; single level
➤ Add 64636 for the second and third levels
Key points:

• Always document the result of prior diagnostic medial branch blocks
• Use radiculopathy diagnosis codes, not just “back pain”
• Include pain relief % (typically ≥ 50% for approval)

📌 C. Epidural Steroid Injections (ESIs)
CPT 64483
Injection, anesthetic/steroid, epidural space, lumbar, transforaminal, single level
CPT 62323
Injection(s), interlaminar epidural (lumbar/sacral) with imaging
What to link with it:

• Diagnosis like M54.16 (lumbar radiculopathy)
• Prior failed treatment (NSAIDs, PT)
• MRI report showing nerve compression
• Pain score and duration (e.g., 6/10 pain for 6 months)

📌 D. Trigger Point Injections
CPT 20552
Injection(s), 1–2 muscles
CPT 20553
Injection(s), 3 or more muscles
Common documentation issues:

• No muscle names listed
• No exam finding (taut band, spasm)
• Diagnosis mismatch (use M79.1 — myalgia)

📌 E. Spinal Cord Stimulator (SCS)
CPT 63650
Percutaneous implantation of epidural neurostimulator trial lead
CPT 63685
Insertion of spinal neurostimulator pulse generator (permanent)
Billing tips:

• Always obtain pre-auth for both trial and implant
• Document psych clearance, successful trial result, and failed conservative care
• Use diagnosis like G89.29 (chronic pain) + radiculopathy

📌 F. Peripheral Nerve Stimulator (PNS)
CPT 64555
Lead placement on peripheral nerve
CPT 64590
Insertion of generator
Make sure:

• Nerve is named in the procedure note (e.g., occipital, femoral)
• Trial result is clearly documented
• Prior treatment attempts are noted

📌 G. Kyphoplasty
CPT 22513
Percutaneous vertebral augmentation (e.g., balloon kyphoplasty), thoracic
What payers want to see:

• Acute fracture diagnosis (e.g., S32.010A)
• MRI/X-ray report
• Failed back bracing and conservative care
• Pain limiting function

📌 H. SI Joint Fusion
CPT 27279
Minimally invasive SI joint fusion (iFuse, Rialto)
Payers require documentation of:

• 6 months of SI joint pain
• 2+ positive diagnostic SI joint injections
• Imaging (X-ray, CT, MRI)
• Functional loss documentation (e.g., difficulty sitting/walking)

🧾 Real-Life Billing Workflow for a Pain Management Practice
Let me walk you through the step-by-step process of billing a real RFA case:

1. Provider performs medial branch block (MBB) → CPT 64493
2. Patient reports 80% relief for 6 hours → ✅
3. Provider schedules RFA
4. Pre-authorization is submitted
5. Claim is submitted with:
   • CPT 64635
   • ICD-10 M54.16
   • POS 11 (office) or POS 24 (ASC)
   • Provider NPI and signature
6. Insurance responds with payment or denial
7. If denied, appeal with documentation including block result, imaging, and provider narrative

🧠 Modifiers and Denial Prevention
Here are common modifier tips:

• -RT / -LT = Right or left side
• -50 = Bilateral (don’t use with -RT or -LT on same line)
• -59 = Distinct procedural service (use with care!)
• -25 = E/M service on same day as a procedure (must be separate and documented)

📚 Documentation = Payment
No matter how clean your codes are, you won’t get paid without supporting documentation.
You must include:

• Procedure notes
• Pain scores
• Imaging results
• Failed treatments
• Specific diagnoses
• Patient function impact (can’t sit, walk, sleep, work)

🏁 Final Tips
Treat every CPT code like a sentence. Ask yourself:

• What was done?
• Why was it medically necessary?
• What does the documentation say?

If you can’t answer all three, the claim is at risk of denial.

📚 References & Additional Reading

• AMA CPT® 2025 Professional Edition
• CMS LCD Policies: Noridian, Novitas, Palmetto (Pain Management)
• AAPC Pain Management Coding Guidelines
• Medicare Claims Processing Manual, Chapter 12
• Commercial Payer Medical Policy Portals (Aetna, Cigna, UHC, BCBS)

In 2025, prior authorization continues to be one of the most misunderstood and undervalued processes in healthcare operations. Medical practices, surgery centers, and diagnostic clinics are losing hundreds of thousands of dollars annually not because they lack patients or skilled providers — but because their authorization workflow is broken.
As a Prior Authorization Manager and Medical Practice Consultant, I see it every day: clinical teams are overwhelmed, denials are mounting, and payer policies keep shifting.

But here’s the truth:
When done right, prior authorization can become a powerful engine of financial protection and patient trust.

Let’s break down what’s changed, why it matters, and how top practices are thriving by treating prior auth as a strategic function — not just a task.

Section 1: The State of Prior Authorization in 2025
1.1 Increased Denial Rates Across SpecialtiesPayers are tightening approval criteria for:

• Orthopedic procedures (e.g., knee and shoulder scopes, joint injections)
• Interventional pain services (RFA, MILD, Vertiflex, spinal stimulators)
• Advanced imaging (MRIs, CTs)
• Durable Medical Equipment (back braces, TENS units)
• Ambulatory Surgery Center (ASC) procedures

Even previously approved cases are now being denied due to retroactive audits.
1.2 Prior Authorization is Now a Compliance RiskPractices that fail to maintain proper documentation for prior auths may now face:

• Clawbacks from payers
• Payment delays
• Audit triggers from Medicare Advantage and commercial plans

Keeping proper records, proof of authorization, submission timestamps, and appeal letters is no longer optional — it’s your legal defense.

Section 2: Common Mistakes That Destroy Prior Auth Approval Rates
Even practices with dedicated staff still fall into the same traps:
❌ Mistake #1: Incomplete Clinical Documentation
​If your provider writes:
“Patient has back pain. Recommend RFA,”
— you can expect a denial.
What payers want to see instead:

• Pain score (0–10)
• Functional impact (e.g., difficulty walking, standing, or sleeping)
• Failed conservative therapies (e.g., PT, NSAIDs, epidural injections)
• Diagnostic evidence (e.g., medial branch block response)
• Justification for procedure (based on published guidelines)

❌ Mistake #2: Missing CPT/ICD Linking
Payers often deny requests when there’s no clear link between diagnosis and procedure. Your auth submission must tie the ICD-10 code directly to the CPT being requested, with supportive language.
❌ Mistake #3: No Follow-Up or Deadline Tracking
Too many practices submit the auth — then forget about it. By the time a denial comes back, the surgery is already canceled or the peer-to-peer deadline has passed.

Section 3: GoHealthcare’s Proven Prior Auth System
At GoHealthcare Practice Solutions, we developed a structured method to streamline authorizations, minimize denials, and align with payer expectations.

✅ Step 1: Clinical Documentation ReviewWe train your team on procedure-specific documentation standards, including:

• ICD-10/CPT match validation
• Pain history summaries
• Conservative therapy timelines
• Functional loss statements
• Clear medical necessity narrative

We provide documentation templates for:

• SI joint fusion
• Spinal cord stimulator
• Vertiflex procedure
• RF ablation
• Kyphoplasty

✅ Step 2: Prior Auth Workflow Checklists (Sample)

Use this checklist for every case:
✅ TaskDescription
Verify patient eligibility
Confirm coverage, plan type, auth requirements
Gather clinical documents
Office notes, imaging, PT records, prior treatments
Match CPT/ICD Crossover
Confirm CPT is covered under patient diagnosis
Submit via payer portal
Use correct fax/online portal with cover sheet
Confirm receipt
Save reference # or submission confirmation
Track daily
Update status log daily until approved/denied
Prepare for peer-to-peer
Schedule, prep provider with appeal script
Save approval
Upload copy to patient chart, notify scheduler

✅ Step 3: Specialty-Based Denial Appeal Strategies
We’ve developed ready-to-use appeal templates and escalation scripts for common denials, such as:

• "Does not meet medical necessity"
• "Conservative treatment not exhausted"
• "Peer-to-peer not completed"
• "Procedure not covered under plan benefits"

We include:

• Clinical restatement
• Reference to payer policy guidelines
• Reiteration of previous treatments
• Provider signature and attestation

Our clients typically see 70–90% overturn rates on appealed denials.

Section 4: The Business Case for Fixing Prior Auth — TodayLet’s run the numbers.
Scenario: 15 RFA procedures per week, $2,500 each

• If 4 are denied monthly → $10,000/month loss
• If surgery slots are left open → lost OR revenue
• If patients leave due to delays → long-term volume loss

Now multiply that across all your procedural volume.
Most specialty practices are losing $250,000–$500,000 per year due to poor auth practices.
Hiring GoHealthcare to implement your program is a fraction of that loss.

Section 5: Our Full-Service Offering (What We Do for You)
When we take over your prior auth operations, we deliver:
✅ Pre-authorization coverage checks
✅ Submission of all required documentation
✅ Peer-to-peer coordination
✅ Denial management and appeals
✅ Daily tracking logs
✅ Documentation training for providers
✅ Surgery scheduler integration
✅ Monthly performance reporting

We handle Orthopedic, Pain, Spine, Neurology, and Ambulatory Surgical Services across:

• Medicare Advantage
• Commercial PPOs
• Workers’ Comp
• Auto Injury (MVA)

Section 6: Prior Auth Support Also Improves Patient Experience
Timely approvals = faster procedures = happier patients.

Our clients report:

• 65% fewer patient complaints related to surgery delays
• Increased compliance with pre-surgical instructions
• Higher online reviews and referrals due to reduced cancellations

When you handle prior auth correctly, your patients feel it.

Section 7: A Prior Auth Success Story — Spine & ASC Practice, Florida
Practice Type: Spine & Interventional Pain
Problem: High-volume orders with an approval rate of 98%
GoHealthcare Actions:

• Documented payer-specific policies for each procedure
• Created appeal templates and scripts for common denials
• Trained all providers on documentation red flags

Results:

• Approval rate jumped to 98% within 30 days
• Peer-to-peer overturn success at 80%
• ASC cancellations decreased by 99%

Section 8: Ready to Take Control?
Your 48-Hour Game PlanDay 1: Internal Audit Checklist

• List all procedures requiring prior auth
• Pull denial rate by CPT over last 90 days
• Identify peer-to-peer completion rates
• Gather turnaround time per payer

Day 2: Book a ConsultationSchedule a free 30-minute session with GoHealthcare. We’ll:

• Review your real cases
• Identify loss trends
• Show you exact steps we’ve used to fix similar issues
• Provide a custom Prior Auth Roadmap

Hard Truth: Prior Authorization is Either Your Weakest Link or Your Competitive Advantage.

Prior authorization is not going away. But neither are your surgical patients, diagnostic procedures, or revenue goals.

So the question becomes — will you treat prior auth as an obstacle or an opportunity?
With the right documentation, policies, training, and execution, you can stop reacting to denials and start protecting your income.

At GoHealthcare Practice Solutions, we help practices like yours every day. Let’s work together to reclaim your time, recover your lost revenue, and restore control over patient scheduling.

What are the most common billing and coding challenges for Pain Management and Orthopedic practices?Answer:
Pain management and orthopedic practices face several coding and billing challenges, including:

• Frequent denials and audits due to complex payer policies.
• Difficulty in getting prior authorization for interventional procedures.
• Inconsistent documentation, leading to medical necessity denials.
• Incorrect modifier usage, which can result in claim rejections.
• Challenges with bundled payments and global surgery packages, affecting reimbursement.

To overcome these issues, practices should ensure accurate documentation, understand payer-specific policies, and conduct internal audits regularly.

FAQ 11: What Strategies Can Be Implemented to Improve Revenue Cycle Management?

Effective revenue cycle management (RCM) is essential for ensuring the financial health of a pain management practice. RCM encompasses everything from patient registration to claim collection.

Here are strategies to optimize your revenue cycle:

Key Revenue Cycle Components:

1. Patient Registration and Eligibility Verification:
   • Accurate Data Capture: Ensure that patient information is recorded accurately from the outset, including insurance details and contact information.
   • Real-Time Verification: Use electronic tools to verify patient eligibility before services are rendered, reducing the likelihood of claim denials.
2. Claims Management:
   • Automated Claim Submission: Leverage software that automatically submits claims, tracks their status, and flags any issues for review.
   • Denial Management: Establish protocols for promptly addressing claim denials, including resubmission procedures and communication with insurance providers.
3. Payment Collection and Follow‑Up:
   • Clear Financial Policies: Communicate payment policies clearly to patients at the time of service, including co-payment expectations and financing options.
   • Automated Reminders: Implement automated systems to remind patients about outstanding balances and upcoming payments.

Strategies for Optimization:

• Dedicated RCM Team: Consider creating a dedicated team responsible for overseeing the revenue cycle, from initial registration to final payment collection.
• Data Analytics: Monitor key RCM metrics, such as claim denial rates and days in accounts receivable, to identify trends and areas for improvement.
• Vendor Partnerships: Work with third‑party RCM specialists if internal resources are limited. Outsourcing certain functions can sometimes lead to more efficient collections and reduced administrative overhead.
• Patient Financial Assistance Programs: Develop programs that assist patients in managing their out‑of‑pocket costs. This not only improves patient satisfaction but can also reduce bad debt.

​
Benefits of a Strong Revenue Cycle

• Increased Cash Flow: Faster and more accurate claims processing directly improves cash flow.
• Reduced Administrative Costs: Streamlining RCM reduces the time staff spend on manual tasks, allowing them to focus on patient care.
• Enhanced Financial Stability: A robust revenue cycle supports long‑term financial planning and investment in new technologies and training.

FAQ 10: How Can Performance Metrics and Data Analytics Drive Clinic Improvements?

​Leveraging data analytics to track performance metrics is essential for continuous improvement in a pain management practice. By systematically monitoring clinical outcomes and operational efficiency, you can make informed decisions that enhance both patient care and financial performance.

Key Performance Metrics:

1. Clinical Outcomes:
   • Patient Pain Scores: Regularly track pain levels before and after treatment to gauge the effectiveness of interventions.
   • Treatment Success Rates: Monitor the percentage of patients who achieve their pain management goals and overall improvement in quality of life.
   • Follow-Up Compliance: Measure patient adherence to follow-up appointments and treatment plans.
2. Operational Efficiency:
   • Appointment Scheduling Metrics: Track no-show rates, average wait times, and scheduling efficiency.
   • Billing and Reimbursement Data: Analyze claim denial rates, days in accounts receivable, and overall reimbursement turnaround time.
   • Resource Utilization: Evaluate how effectively staff time and clinical resources are allocated.
3. Patient Satisfaction:
   • Surveys and Feedback: Use patient satisfaction surveys to gather qualitative data on the care experience.
   • Net Promoter Score (NPS): Measure patients’ likelihood to recommend your clinic to others as an indicator of overall satisfaction.

Utilizing Data Analytics Tools

• Integrated Dashboards: Modern practice management systems often include dashboards that consolidate key metrics in real time. These dashboards allow you to quickly identify areas that require improvement.
• Trend Analysis: Analyzing trends over time can help predict potential issues before they become critical. For example, an upward trend in billing errors might indicate the need for additional staff training.
• Benchmarking: Compare your clinic’s performance against industry benchmarks or similar practices. Benchmarking can provide insights into where your practice excels and where improvements are needed.

​
Implementing Data-Driven Improvements

• Regular Review Meetings: Establish regular meetings with key staff members to review performance data and develop action plans.
• Feedback Integration: Use data insights to refine clinical protocols, optimize resource allocation, and improve patient engagement strategies.
• Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI): Adopt a CQI framework that incorporates regular data reviews, goal setting, and performance monitoring.

FAQ 9: How Can Risk Management and Legal Compliance Be Maintained in a Pain Management Practice?

​Pain management clinics face a high degree of regulatory scrutiny, particularly due to the use of controlled substances and the inherent risks associated with chronic pain treatment. Implementing robust risk management and legal compliance strategies is essential to protect your practice and ensure the highest standards of care.

Key Areas of Risk Management

1. Clinical Protocols and Guidelines:
   • Standardized Treatment Plans: Develop and adhere to standardized protocols for patient evaluation, treatment, and follow‑up. These protocols should be based on evidence‑based practices and regularly reviewed.
   • Opioid Prescribing Policies: Establish strict guidelines for opioid prescribing, including dose limits, duration, and mandatory patient agreements. Ensure that all prescribing practices align with federal and state regulations.
2. Documentation and Record‑Keeping:
   • Comprehensive Records: Maintain detailed documentation of every patient encounter, treatment decision, and prescription. This documentation is critical not only for patient care but also for defending against legal challenges.
   • Audit Trails: Utilize software that automatically tracks changes and logs user activity, providing a clear audit trail in case of regulatory review or legal inquiry.
3. Staff Training and Accountability:
   • Regular Compliance Training: Implement ongoing training programs that cover legal updates, best practices in risk management, and the safe handling of controlled substances.
   • Clear Policies and Procedures: Ensure that all staff members understand their roles and responsibilities regarding compliance and that protocols for reporting potential issues are in place.
4. Legal and Regulatory Consultation:
   • Expert Advice: Engage legal counsel with expertise in healthcare and pain management to review policies, conduct risk assessments, and provide guidance on complex regulatory issues.
   • Compliance Committees: Establish an internal compliance committee responsible for monitoring practices, conducting periodic reviews, and ensuring that corrective actions are taken when necessary.
5. Insurance and Liability Coverage:
   • Adequate Coverage: Work with insurance providers to secure malpractice and liability coverage that adequately protects your practice against potential claims.
   • Regular Reviews: Periodically review your insurance policies and risk management strategies to ensure they remain aligned with current regulations and practice needs.

Benefits of Robust Risk Management

• Enhanced Patient Safety: Comprehensive risk management leads to fewer adverse events and a safer care environment.
• Legal Protection: Detailed documentation and adherence to protocols help defend your practice in the event of legal scrutiny.
• Operational Stability: Reducing risk minimizes disruptions to your practice, ensuring smooth day‑to‑day operations.
• Improved Reputation: A strong commitment to compliance and risk management builds trust with patients, regulatory bodies, and insurers.

FAQ 8: What Training Resources Are Available for Staff in a Pain Management Clinic?

​Effective staff training is essential to ensure that every member of your clinic is prepared to manage the complex challenges of pain management practice. Comprehensive training programs not only improve operational efficiency but also enhance patient care.

Here are several training resources and best practices:

In‑House Training Programs

• Structured Onboarding: Develop a detailed onboarding program that covers everything from the clinic’s mission and values to specific protocols related to pain management.
• Role‑Specific Training: Tailor training modules to the specific roles within your clinic—whether for physicians, nurses, administrative staff, or billing personnel.
• Regular Refresher Courses: Schedule periodic training sessions to review new guidelines, software updates, and industry best practices.

External Training and Certification

• Online Courses and Webinars: Leverage platforms that offer specialized courses in pain management, medical billing, and regulatory compliance. Many reputable organizations provide certifications that can enhance your staff’s credentials.
• Industry Conferences and Workshops: Attend conferences, workshops, and seminars focused on pain management and healthcare administration. These events offer opportunities for hands‑on training and networking with industry experts.
• Vendor‑Provided Training: Many practice management software vendors provide comprehensive training resources, including live webinars, tutorial videos, and detailed user manuals.

Continuous Education and Professional Development

• Accredited Programs: Encourage staff to participate in accredited programs and continuing education courses that focus on pain management and healthcare compliance.
• Peer‑to‑Peer Learning: Create a mentorship program where experienced staff members guide newer employees. Regular team meetings can also foster an environment of shared learning and continuous improvement.
• Certification Incentives: Consider offering incentives for staff who earn additional certifications or complete advanced training programs. This not only boosts morale but also enhances the overall skill level of your team.

 Leveraging Technology for Training 

• E‑Learning Platforms: Invest in e‑learning solutions that allow staff to complete training modules at their own pace. These platforms often include interactive components, quizzes, and progress tracking.
• Virtual Reality (VR) and Simulation: Emerging technologies such as VR and simulation-based training can provide immersive experiences for clinical scenarios, helping staff to better prepare for real‑world challenges.
• Learning Management Systems (LMS): An LMS can help organize training materials, track staff progress, and generate reports on training effectiveness.

Benefits of Comprehensive Training

• Increased Efficiency: Well‑trained staff are more efficient in managing daily operations, reducing errors in billing, scheduling, and patient documentation.
• Improved Patient Care: Ongoing education ensures that providers stay current on the latest treatment protocols and regulatory requirements, leading to better patient outcomes.
• Enhanced Compliance: Regular training in compliance and risk management minimizes the risk of legal issues and helps maintain high standards of patient safety.
• Staff Retention and Satisfaction: Investing in employee development demonstrates a commitment to staff well‑being and professional growth, which can improve retention rates and overall job satisfaction.

FAQ 7: What Factors Should I Consider When Choosing a Practice Management Solution?

Selecting the right practice management solution is critical for ensuring that your pain management clinic operates efficiently.

Here are the key factors to consider:

Key Considerations:

1. Integration Capabilities:
   • EHR Compatibility: The system should seamlessly integrate with your existing Electronic Health Records, laboratory systems, and imaging platforms.
   • Interoperability: Ensure that the software can communicate with other systems, such as billing platforms and insurance portals.
2. Customization and Scalability:
   • Tailored Solutions: Look for a system that can be customized to match the unique workflows and requirements of pain management practices.
   • Growth Potential: The solution should scale as your clinic expands, whether that means adding new services or integrating additional locations.
3. User-Friendly Interface:
   • Ease of Use: A clear and intuitive interface minimizes the learning curve for staff and reduces the likelihood of errors.
   • Mobile Accessibility: Ensure that the system offers mobile or cloud-based solutions so that providers and administrators can access data from anywhere.
4. Robust Reporting and Analytics:
   • Data-Driven Insights: Advanced analytics features can help you track clinical outcomes, billing performance, and patient satisfaction.
   • Custom Reports: The ability to generate customized reports allows you to monitor KPIs specific to your practice’s needs.
5. Vendor Support and Training:
   • Comprehensive Onboarding: A reliable vendor offers thorough onboarding and training programs for all staff.
   • Ongoing Support: Ensure that technical support is available 24/7 and that regular system updates are provided to keep the software compliant with the latest regulations.
6. Security and Compliance:
   • Data Protection: The solution must comply with HIPAA and other relevant regulations, ensuring that patient data is securely managed.
   • Audit Trails: Features such as detailed audit logs help track user activity and ensure regulatory compliance.

​
Evaluating Your Options

• Demo and Trial Periods: Request demonstrations and trial periods to assess how the software performs in a real-world setting.
• Peer Reviews: Seek feedback from other pain management clinics that have implemented the solution to learn about their experiences and challenges.
• Cost vs. Benefit Analysis: Evaluate the total cost of ownership, including implementation, training, and ongoing maintenance, against the expected improvements in efficiency and patient outcomes.

FAQ 6: How Can Billing and Insurance Processing Be Optimized for Pain Management?

Billing and insurance processing are two of the most complex and critical functions in a pain management practice. Errors or delays in these areas can significantly impact cash flow and patient satisfaction.

Here are several strategies to optimize these processes:
 
Understanding the Challenges

• Complex Billing Codes: Pain management services often involve multiple procedures and services that require precise coding. Errors in coding can lead to claim denials or delays in reimbursement.
• Insurance Variability: Different insurance carriers have unique requirements for pre-authorizations, documentation, and claim submissions. This variation can complicate billing processes.
• High Administrative Load: Manual data entry and verification of insurance details consume valuable time, reducing the efficiency of the administrative staff.

  Strategies for Optimization

1. Implement Automated Billing Systems:
   • Automation Benefits: Using practice management software that automates the billing cycle can significantly reduce human error. Automated systems verify patient eligibility, check for necessary pre-authorizations, and streamline claim submissions.
   • Real-Time Error Checking: Advanced software can flag discrepancies immediately, ensuring that mistakes are corrected before claims are submitted.
2. Specialized Staff Training:
   • Coding Workshops: Regular training sessions focused on the latest CPT, ICD, and HCPCS coding guidelines help maintain accuracy.
   • Insurance Protocols: Train billing personnel on the specific requirements of major insurance carriers, including pre-authorization protocols and documentation standards.
   • Regular Audits: Implement routine audits to review coding accuracy and identify trends that may require additional training or process adjustments.
3. Utilize Data Analytics:
   • Performance Metrics: Track key performance indicators (KPIs) such as claim denial rates, days in accounts receivable, and reimbursement turnaround time.
   • Feedback Loops: Use data analytics to identify bottlenecks in the billing process and implement targeted improvements.
4. Engage with a Revenue Cycle Management (RCM) Specialist:
   • Expert Consultation: Partnering with an RCM specialist can help you identify inefficiencies, negotiate better terms with insurers, and optimize your overall billing process.
   • Outsourcing Options: For some clinics, outsourcing certain aspects of the billing process can be cost-effective and improve accuracy.
5. Standardize Documentation:
   • Consistent Record-Keeping: Establish standardized forms and templates for patient encounters. Consistent documentation ensures that all necessary information is captured for claim submissions.
   • Electronic Health Records (EHR) Integration: Seamless integration between your EHR and billing software can facilitate the automatic transfer of patient data, reducing manual entry errors.

​
Benefits of Optimization

• Improved Cash Flow: Faster claim approvals and accurate reimbursements contribute to a more stable financial foundation.
• Reduced Administrative Burden: Automating routine tasks frees up staff to focus on more complex patient care issues.
• Enhanced Patient Satisfaction: Clear, efficient billing processes reduce the likelihood of disputes or delays that can affect patient trust.